Daniel Evans and Ethan Quinn will face off in the qualifications of the Canberra Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on Court 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Evans -> 1.48
Ethan Quinn -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Daniel Evans and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Daniel Evans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-26 | 8-11 | 3-8 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-27 | 11-15 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-24 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 3-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, the Brit reached the qualifications after beating Emilio Nava 7-5 0-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Brit defeated Nava (7-5 0-6 6-3).During the match, Evans scored less points (2) than Nava. In fact, the world no. 164 won 84 points vs Nava’s. That means that Evans was more focused during the important points. Evans was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Evans managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Daniel Evans lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Evans put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (13/32) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Nava 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Evans has positive record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (309-213). 8-11 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Evans has a composed 155-100 match record in the last years on hard.
Evans has a compiled 18-26 win-loss record in 2024, 8-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Canberra Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-1 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 202 (career-high), Quinn reached the qualifications after beating Paul Jubb 7-6(4) 6-4.
In the qualifications, Quinn had a good straight sets win against Jubb (7-64 6-4). During the match Quinn scored 77 points vs Jubb’s 69. Quinn was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn scored 6 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Ethan Quinn was pretty effective on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Quinn broke Jubb twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Champaign Challenger where he beat Nishesh Basavareddy in the final 6-3 6-1.
Ethan has an overall 33-34 win-loss record in 2024, 17-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Evans | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 23 |
| Pts | 84-86 | 77-69 |
| Total Points | 170 | 146 |
| Winners | 38 | 34 |
| %Winners | 45% | 44% |
Both Evans and Quinn played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Evans lost 1 set while Ethan Quinn hasn’t lost a set so far. Evans has played 1 set more than Quinn (3 vs 2). Therefore, Evans played 4 games more than Quinn. Evans scored 38 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 34 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Evans | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
| 1st in | 55/87 | 48/79 |
| %1st in | 63% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 38/55 | 34/48 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 13/32 | 18/31 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 58% |
Evans scored 4 aces . Quinn made 6 aces . Evans won 69% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Evans | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 5 |
| % Saved | 56% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Evans surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Ethan conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Evans | |||
| Q1 Nava | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 0-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 84-86 | 84-86 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 55/87 | 55/87 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 38/55 | 38/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/32 | 13/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Quinn | |||
| Q1 Jubb | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 77-69 | 77-69 | |
| Total points | 146 | 146 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 48/79 | 48/79 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Patrick KypsonKypson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Harold MayotMayot (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Brandon HoltHolt (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction