Hady Habib and Edward Winter will play each other in the qualifications of the Canberra Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on Court 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hady Habib who should win in 2 sets.
Hady Habib -> 1.24
Edward Winter -> 3.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hady Habib vs. Edward Winter
There is no head to head record between Hady Habib and Edward Winter since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Hady Habib
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 47-35 | 21-11 | 25-21 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 58-27 | 38-11 | 17-10 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-25 | 21-14 | 9-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 40-13 | 31-10 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 216 (career-high), Hady got to the qualifications after beating Sho Shimabukuro 7-6(0) 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Lebanese had a good straight sets win against Shimabukuro (7-60 6-3). During the match, Habib scored 76 points vs Shimabukuro’s 52. Habib was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Habib bagged 12 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Hady Habib was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 88% (42/48) of his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Lebanese broke Shimabukuro once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Habib has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (302-167). 21-11 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Habib has an overall 184-85 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Temuco Challenger where he defeated Camilo Ugo Carabelli in the final 6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(2).
The Lebanese has an aggregate 47-35 win-loss record in 2024, 21-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Canberra Challenger
Hady has never competed in this tournament before.
Edward Winter
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 27-19 | 25-17 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-20 | 19-17 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 12-11 | 10-10 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 593, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Pierre-Hugues Herbert 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Winter had a good straight sets win against Herbert (6-1 6-2). During the match Winter scored 62 points vs Herbert’s 41. Winter was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Winter couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Edward Winter conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Winter put 73% of his first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Herbert 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Winter has a composed 27-19 win-loss record in 2024, 25-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Habib | Winter |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 22 | 15 |
Pts | 76-52 | 62-41 |
Total Points | 128 | 103 |
Winners | 42 | 31 |
%Winners | 55% | 50% |
Both Habib and Winter played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Habib and Winter have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Habib played 7 games more than Winter. Hady scored 42 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, Edward struck 31 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Habib | Winter |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 0 |
Avg per match | 12 | 0 |
1st in | 48/64 | 47/64 |
%1st in | 75% | 73% |
1st pts | 42/48 | 31/47 |
%1st pts | 88% | 66% |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 10/17 |
%2nd pts | 69% | 59% |
Habib made 12 aces . Winter didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Habib won 88% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Winter won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Habib | Winter |
---|---|---|
Won | 1 | 4 |
Converted | 1/4 | 4/7 |
% Converted | 25% | 57% |
Conceded | 2 | 5 |
Saved | 2 | 5 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Lebanese broke his opponent once with a 25% conversion rate. The Lebanese very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. Edward broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Winter was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
Habib | |||
Q1 Shimabukuro | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-60 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 76-52 | 76-52 | |
Total points | 128 | 128 | |
Winners | 42 | 42 | |
%Winners | 55% | 55% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 48/64 | 48/64 | |
% 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
1st pts | 42/48 | 42/48 | |
% 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Winter | |||
Q1 Herbert | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 62-41 | 62-41 | |
Total points | 103 | 103 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 50% | 50% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 47/64 | 47/64 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 31/47 | 31/47 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Patrick KypsonKypson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Harold MayotMayot (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Brandon HoltHolt (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction