Nao Hibino and Sachia Vickery will fight against each other in the qualifications of the ASB Classic for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on Grand Stand. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sachia Vickery who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sachia Vickery is the pick to win this match.
Sachia Vickery -> 1.86
Nao Hibino -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nao Hibino vs. Sachia Vickery
This will be the 4th time that Nao Hibino and Sachia Vickery square off. The head to head is 2-1 for Vickery (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Hibino won 6-2 6-2 in the qualifications in at the French Open back in 2022.
Nao Hibino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 21-21 | 2-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-21 | 1-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 146, Hibino reached the qualifications after beating Elyse Tse 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Tse (6-4 6-2). During the match, Hibino scored 59 points vs Tse’s 41. The Japanese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hibino couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the match and she committed only 4 double faults. Nao Hibino lost the serve 4 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Hibino put 71% of her first serves in, winning 51% (20/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (8/16) on the 2nd serve. Nao broke Tse 7 times after converting 88% of her break points (7/8).
Hibino has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 53% of her matches (302-266). 21-21 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Hibino has a composed 226-180 match record in the last years on hard.
Hibino has a compiled 27-32 win-loss record in 2024, 21-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Auckland
Sachia Vickery
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 22-21 | 14-12 | 7-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-23 | 19-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-26 | 25-16 | 7-7 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-17 | 10-10 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 202, Vickery got to the qualifications after beating Laura Pigossi 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Vickery had a good straight sets win against Pigossi (6-2 6-3). During the match Vickery scored 63 points vs Pigossi’s 48. Sachia was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Vickery was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Sachia Vickery lost the serve 3 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Vickery put 53% of her first serves in, winning 71% (22/31) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (10/28) on the 2nd serve. Vickery broke Pigossi 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Sachia’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the W100 Irapuato.
Vickery has an overall 22-21 win-loss record in 2024, 14-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Auckland
Previously, her best result was reaching the semifinal in 2018. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hibino | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 59-41 | 63-48 |
| Total Points | 100 | 111 |
| Winners | 20 | 22 |
| %Winners | 34% | 35% |
Both Hibino and Vickery played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hibino and Vickery have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hibino played 1 game more than Vickery. Nao scored 20 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Sachia recorded 22 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hibino | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 39/55 | 31/59 |
| %1st in | 71% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 20/39 | 22/31 |
| %1st pts | 51% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 10/28 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 36% |
Hibino didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Vickery also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Hibino won 51% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Vickery won 71% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hibino | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/8 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 88% | 67% |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 56% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Hibino broke her opponent 7 times with a 88% conversion rate. The Japanese surrendered her serve 4 times and she saved 56% of the break points that she conceded. Vickery broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Vickery conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Hibino | |||
| Q1 Tse |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-41 | 59-41 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 20/39 | 20/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 51% | 51% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 8/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/8 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 88% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Vickery | |||
| Q1 Pigossi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-48 | 63-48 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/59 | 31/59 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 10/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLWWL
LLLWLWLLWL Tennis Scores in Auckland
- Stefano BattaglinoBattaglino – Giacomo DambrosiDambrosi (3-6 6-4 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Luca TomasettoTomasetto – Gianluca AcquaroliAcquaroli (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Leonardo TaddiaTaddia – Tobias KirchlechnerKirchlechner (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Federico MaccariMaccari (4-6 6-4 10-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Monique BarryBarry – Lina GlushkoGlushko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Sachia VickeryVickery (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Emina BektasBektas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Jaqueline CristianCristian (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Xiyu WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lulu SunSun – Rebecca MarinoMarino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Sloane StephensStephens (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
