Federico Coria and Kimmer Coppejans will square off in the quarter of the Maia Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Coria who should win in 3 sets.
Federico Coria -> 1.48
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Federico Coria vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 4th time that Federico Coria and Kimmer Coppejans fight against each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Coria (see full H2H stats), 3-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Coria won 6-3 6-3 in the 1st round in the Lyon Challenger back in 2022.
Federico Coria
44 - 34win/loss
101
49
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-34 | 0-3 | 44-30 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 3-8 | 35-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-32 | 2-5 | 39-26 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-31 | 2-7 | 40-20 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-22 | 3-5 | 15-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 101, Coria got to the quarter after beating Geoffrey Blancaneaux 6-1 1-0 ret. and Adrian Andreev w/o.
In the 2nd round, Federico defeated Andreev (w/o). During the match, Coria and Andreev scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 101 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Federico was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Talking about the service games, Coria couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Federico Coria conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Coria has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (447-291). 44-30 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Coria has a composed 431-242 record in the last years on clay.
Federico’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Piracicaba Challenger and the Buenos Aires Challenger.
Federico has a compiled 44-34 win-loss record in 2024, 44-30 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Maia Challenger
Federico has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
28 - 7win/loss
422
97
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-7 | 22-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 14-17 | 6-5 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, Coppejans got to the quarter after beating Samuel Vincent Ruggeri 6-4 6-0 and Alejandro Moro Canas 6-4 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Moro Canas (6-4 6-1). During the match Coppejans scored 56 points vs Moro Canas’s 38. The Belgian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Coppejans struck 3 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Kimmer Coppejans was very efficient on serve to win 90% (19/21) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kimmer broke Moro Canas 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kimmer hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 61% of the points he played.
Coppejans’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M25 Monastir.
Kimmer has a composed 28-7 win-loss record in 2024, 6-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Coria | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 8 | 33 |
| Pts | 37-22 | 116-73 |
| Total Points | 59 | 189 |
| Winners | 9 | 41 |
| %Winners | 24% | 35% |
Coria played 1 match while Coppejans competed in 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Coria has played 1 set(s) less than Coppejans (3 vs 4). Therefore, Coria played 25 games less than Coppejans. The Argentine scored 9 winners (24% of the total points). On the other side, Kimmer fired 41 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Coria | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 11/22 | 49/87 |
| %1st in | 50% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 9/11 | 41/49 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 26/38 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 68% |
Coria didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Coppejans struck 7 aces (3.5 per match). Coria won 82% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Coria | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 8 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 8/14 |
| % Converted | 30% | 57% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Federico broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Coria had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Kimmer broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Belgian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Coria | ||||
| R1 Blancaneaux | R2 Andreev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 1-0 ret. | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | – | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 8 | – | 8 | |
| pts | 37-22 | – | 37-22 | |
| Total points | 59 | – | 59 | |
| Winners | 9 | – | 9 | |
| %Winners | 24% | – | 24% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | – | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | – | 1 | |
| 1st in | 11/22 | – | 11/22 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | – | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 9/11 | – | 9/11 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | – | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | – | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | – | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | – | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | – | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | – | 30% | |
| Conceded | 0 | – | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | – | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | – | 0 | |
| Coppejans | ||||
| R1 Vincent | R2 Moro | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 33 | |
| pts | 60-35 | 56-38 | 116-73 | |
| Total points | 95 | 94 | 189 | |
| Winners | 22 | 19 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 34% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/44 | 21/43 | 49/87 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 49% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 19/21 | 41/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 90% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 14/22 | 26/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 64% | 68% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/5 | 8/14 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 80% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 2/2 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Maia Challenger
- Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov – N.Sriram Balaji/Rithvik Choudary BollipalliBalaji/Rithvik Choudary Bollipalli (3-6 6-3 10-6) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrej MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Federico CoriaCoria (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction