Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Philip Sekulic will face off in the 2nd round of the Yokkaichi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.53
Philip Sekulic -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Philip Sekulic
This will be the 2nd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Philip Sekulic clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Sekulic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Sekulic won 6-2 6-1 in the 1st round in the Chicago Challenger back in July 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
41 - 35win/loss
163
128
WLWWLLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-35 | 39-25 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 163, Lam Coleman Wong reached the 2nd round after beating Masamichi Imamura 2-6 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round against Imamura, Lam Coleman Wong recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-5 6-4).During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored less points (1) than Imamura. In fact, the world no. 163 won 93 points vs Imamura’s. That means that Lam Coleman Wong was more focused during the important points. The was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong struck 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was quite efficient on serve to win 71% (40/56) of his 1st serve and 54% (20/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Lam Coleman Wong broke Imamura 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (132-99). 39-25 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed109-71 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
The has an aggregate 41-35 win-loss record in 2024, 39-25 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger
Philip Sekulic
33 - 30win/loss
329
225
WLWWWLWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-30 | 32-25 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 33-24 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-23 | 19-15 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 329, Sekulic got to the 2nd round after beating Yusuke Takahashi 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Philip had a good straight sets win against Takahashi (6-3 6-2). During the match Sekulic scored 67 points vs Takahashi’s 50. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Sekulic made 2 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Philip Sekulic lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Sekulic put 82% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 78% (7/9) on the 2nd serve. Philip broke Takahashi 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
The Australian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Wuxi Challenger,the Kachreti Challenger and M25 Cairns.
Sekulic has an overall 33-30 win-loss record in 2024, 32-25 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 17 |
| Pts | 93-94 | 67-50 |
| Total Points | 187 | 117 |
| Winners | 40 | 28 |
| %Winners | 43% | 42% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Sekulic played 1 match. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 1 set while Philip Sekulic hasn’t lost a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set more than Sekulic (3 vs 2). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 13 games more than Sekulic. The scored 40 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Philip blasted 28 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 56/93 | 40/49 |
| %1st in | 60% | 82% |
| 1st pts | 40/56 | 28/40 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 20/37 | 7/9 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 78% |
Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 7 aces . Sekulic bagged 2 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 71% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Sekulic won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 78% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 40% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Chak broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Chak lost his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Philip broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Philip conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Imamura |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 93-94 | 93-94 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 56/93 | 56/93 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 40/56 | 40/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/37 | 20/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Sekulic | |||
| R1 Takahashi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/49 | 40/49 | |
| % 1st in | 82% | 82% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLLWLWL
WLWWWLWLLW Tennis Scores in Yokkaichi Challenger
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (2-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-63 7-68) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Mattia BellucciBellucci (6-71 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – James McCabeMcCabe (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Alafia AyeniAyeni (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Yua TakaTaka (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Philip HenningHenning (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Jakub PaulPaul (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Ryotaro TaguchiTaguchi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Dane SweenySweeny (7-610 6-2) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Kokoro IsomuraIsomura (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Yua TakaTaka (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Alafia AyeniAyeni (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-6(3) 7-6(8)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
