Ryan Nijboer and Lucas Bouquet will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Maia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Nijboer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ryan Nijboer is the pick to win this match.
Ryan Nijboer -> 1.44
Lucas Bouquet -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ryan Nijboer vs. Lucas Bouquet
There is no head to head record between Ryan Nijboer and Lucas Bouquet since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Ryan Nijboer
50 - 36win/loss
389
371
LWWLWWLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 53-38 | 8-3 | 45-32 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-32 | 12-9 | 41-21 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-23 | 1-6 | 22-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-28 | 9-13 | 18-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-17 | 13-7 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 389, Ryan reached the qualifications after beating Diogo Marques 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Marques (6-3 6-2). During the match, Nijboer scored 68 points vs Marques’s 44. The Dutch was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nijboer fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Ryan Nijboer was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 78% (28/36) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Marques 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Nijboer has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (249-188). 42-30 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nijboer has a compiled152-111 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Ryan’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Manacor,Laukariz,M15 Gijon and M25 Zaragoza.
Ryan has an aggregate 50-36 win-loss record in 2024, 42-30 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Maia Challenger
Lucas Bouquet
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-27 | 0-0 | 49-23 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-22 | 0-0 | 22-19 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 24-23 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-14 | 0-0 | 35-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 527, Lucas got to the qualifications after defeating Alexey Vatutin 2-6 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Vatutin, Bouquet recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 6-3).During the match Bouquet scored less points (1) than Vatutin. In fact, the world no. 389 won 78 points vs Vatutin’s. That means that Bouquet was more focused during the important points. Bouquet was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Bouquet made 2 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lucas Bouquet lost the serve 6 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Bouquet put 57% of his first serves in, winning 49% (21/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Vatutin 7 times after converting 64% of his break points (7/11).
Bouquet’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Kalmar and M15 Cap d’Agde.
Lucas has a compiled 47-23 win-loss record in 2024, 45-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Maia Challenger
Lucas has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nijboer | Bouquet |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 |
| Pts | 68-44 | 78-79 |
| Total Points | 112 | 157 |
| Winners | 28 | 21 |
| %Winners | 41% | 27% |
Both Nijboer and Bouquet played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Lucas Bouquet conceded 1 set while Ryan Nijboer hasn’t conceded a set so far. Nijboer has played 1 set(s) less than Bouquet (2 vs 3). Therefore, Nijboer played 9 games less than Bouquet. Ryan scored 28 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Lucas fired 21 winners (27%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nijboer | Bouquet |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 36/51 | 43/76 |
| %1st in | 71% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 21/43 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 49% |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 19/33 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 58% |
Nijboer bagged 3 aces . Bouquet managed to score 2 aces . Nijboer won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Bouquet won 49% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nijboer | Bouquet |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 7/11 |
| % Converted | 33% | 64% |
| Conceded | 4 | 9 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Dutch dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Bouquet broke his opponent 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Bouquet conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nijboer | |||
| Q1 Marques |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-44 | 68-44 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 36/51 | 36/51 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Bouquet | |||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 78-79 | 78-79 | |
| Total points | 157 | 157 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/76 | 43/76 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 21/43 | 21/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 49% | 49% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| Converted % | 64% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/9 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLLLW
LWWLWWLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas BouquetBouquet – Ryan NijboerNijboer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksandr OvcharenkoOvcharenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Maxime JanvierJanvier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
