Kimmer Coppejans and Inaki Montes-De La Torre will square off in the 2nd round of the Montemar Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kimmer Coppejans who should win in 3 sets.
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.56
Inaki Montes-De La Torre -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Inaki Montes-De La Torre
This will be the 2nd time that Kimmer Coppejans and Inaki Montes-De La Torre face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Coppejans (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Coppejans won 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 in the semifinal in M15 Monastir back in October 2024.
Kimmer Coppejans
26 - 6win/loss
437
97
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 26-6 | 22-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2020 | 14-17 | 6-5 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, the Belgian got to the 2nd round after beating Vilius Gaubas 1-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Gaubas, The Belgian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-4 6-4).During the match, Coppejans scored less points (4) than Gaubas. In fact, the world no. 437 won 80 points vs Gaubas’s. That means that Coppejans was more focused during the important points. Kimmer was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Coppejans made 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 58% of his first serves in, winning 74% (37/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (14/36) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Gaubas 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Coppejans has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (331-252). 4-2 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Coppejans has a composed 232-160 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Kimmer’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M25 Monastir.
Coppejans has a compiled 26-6 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montemar Challenger
Coppejans has never competed in this tournament before.
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
22 - 10win/loss
709
493
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-10 | 15-5 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 22-9 | 5-4 | 9-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 22-11 | 8-7 | 7-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-7 | 9-4 | 10-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 709, Inaki got to the 2nd round after beating Alex Marti Pujolras 7-5 6-3, David Pichler 6-4 0-6 6-3 and Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Rodriguez Taverna (6-2 7-5). During the match Montes-De La Torre scored 75 points vs Rodriguez Taverna’s 65. Inaki was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Montes-De La Torre wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Inaki Montes-De La Torre lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Montes-De La Torre put 66% of his first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Montes-De La Torre broke Rodriguez Taverna 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
The Spaniard’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
The Spaniard has an aggregate 22-10 win-loss record in 2024, 7-5 on clay (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Coppejans | Montes-De La Torre |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 27 | 66 |
Pts | 80-84 | 236-217 |
Total Points | 164 | 453 |
Winners | 37 | 97 |
%Winners | 46% | 41% |
Coppejans played 1 match while Montes-De La Torre competed in 3 matches. Montes-De La Torre started his run from the qualifications while Coppejans had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Kimmer Coppejans dropped 1 set, while Inaki Montes-De La Torre conceded 1 set. Coppejans has played 4 set(s) less than Montes-De La Torre (3 vs 7). Therefore, Coppejans played 39 games less than Montes-De La Torre. Kimmer scored 37 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard struck 97 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Coppejans | Montes-De La Torre |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 2 |
Avg per match | 3 | 0.7 |
1st in | 50/86 | 144/235 |
%1st in | 58% | 61% |
1st pts | 37/50 | 97/144 |
%1st pts | 74% | 67% |
2nd pts | 14/36 | 40/91 |
%2nd pts | 39% | 44% |
Coppejans struck 3 aces . Montes-De La Torre bagged 2 aces (0.7 per match). Coppejans won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Montes-De La Torre won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Coppejans | Montes-De La Torre |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 14 |
Converted | 3/7 | 14/33 |
% Converted | 43% | 42% |
Conceded | 9 | 17 |
Saved | 5 | 8 |
% Saved | 56% | 47% |
Times Broken | 4 | 9 |
Kimmer broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Kimmer conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Inaki broke his opponents 14 times with a 42% conversion rate. Inaki conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 47% of the break points that he conceded.
Coppejans | |||
R1 Gaubas | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 80-84 | 80-84 | |
Total points | 164 | 164 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 50/86 | 50/86 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 37/50 | 37/50 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 14/36 | 14/36 | |
% 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Montes-De La Torre | |||||
Q1 Marti Pujolras | Q3 Pichler | R1 Rodriguez Taverna | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 0-6 6-3 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 25 | 20 | 66 | |
pts | 79-68 | 82-84 | 75-65 | 236-217 | |
Total points | 147 | 166 | 140 | 453 | |
Winners | 29 | 37 | 31 | 97 | |
%Winners | 37% | 45% | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 8 | 3 | 12 | |
1st in | 45/72 | 52/92 | 47/71 | 144/235 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 57% | 66% | 61% | |
1st pts | 29/45 | 37/52 | 31/47 | 97/144 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 71% | 66% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 15/27 | 14/40 | 11/24 | 40/91 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 35% | 46% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | |
Converted | 5/17 | 4/6 | 5/10 | 14/33 | |
Converted % | 29% | 67% | 50% | 42% | |
Conceded | 3 | 9 | 5 | 17 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 4/9 | 3/5 | 8 | |
Saved % | 33% | 44% | 60% | 137% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
Tennis Scores in Montemar Challenger
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Sumit NagalNagal (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-74 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Miguel DamasDamas (7-60 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (4-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Svyatoslav GulinGulin – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Daniel RinconRincon (6-2 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Iliyan RadulovRadulov – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-5 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer – Francesco PassaroPassaro (7-64 4-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-3 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Vilius GaubasGaubas (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-1 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (3-3) – H2H and prediction