Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Shintaro Mochizuki will play each other in the 2nd round of the Yokohama Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.57
Shintaro Mochizuki -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Shintaro Mochizuki
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Shintaro Mochizuki since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
39 - 34win/loss
161
128
WLLWLWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-34 | 37-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 161, Lam Coleman Wong reached the 2nd round after beating Lennon Roark Jones 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Roark Jones (6-2 6-1). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 60 points vs Roark Jones’s 34. The was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 83% (19/23) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Lam Coleman Wong broke Roark Jones 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (130-98). 37-24 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled107-70 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Chak has an overall 39-34 win-loss record in 2024, 37-24 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokohama Challenger
Shintaro Mochizuki
26 - 31win/loss
252
129
WLLWWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-31 | 17-20 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-33 | 22-16 | 13-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-34 | 18-17 | 13-12 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-30 | 11-10 | 18-11 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 20-14 | 14-12 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252, the Japanese reached the 2nd round after defeating Ji Sung Nam 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Shintaro had a good straight sets win against Sung Nam (6-2 6-2). During the match Mochizuki scored 56 points vs Sung Nam’s 31. Mochizuki was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Mochizuki made 2 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Shintaro Mochizuki lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Mochizuki put 68% of his first serves in, winning 63% (19/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Sung Nam 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Mochizuki has an overall 26-31 win-loss record in 2024, 17-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokohama Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
| Pts | 60-34 | 56-31 |
| Total Points | 94 | 87 |
| Winners | 19 | 19 |
| %Winners | 32% | 34% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Mochizuki played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Mochizuki have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 1 game less than Mochizuki. Chak scored 19 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Mochizuki struck 19 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 30/44 |
| %1st in | 58% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 19/30 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 10/14 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 71% |
Lam Coleman Wong scored 3 aces . Mochizuki managed to score 2 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 83% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Mochizuki won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 6/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 86% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Shintaro broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Roark Jones |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-34 | 60-34 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 23/40 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 19/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Mochizuki | |||
| R1 Sung Nam |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 56-31 | 56-31 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 86% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWLWLWWL
WLLWWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Yokohama Challenger
- Federico CinaCina – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Alexander BlockxBlockx (5-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Jakub PaulPaul (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Omar JasikaJasika (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-61 2-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Mattia BellucciBellucci (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Christoph NegrituNegritu (3-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Dane SweenySweeny (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Matej DodigDodig (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Lennon Roark JonesRoark Jones (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Yaroslav DeminDemin (6-1 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Alex BoltBolt (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Jakub PaulPaul (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
