Oleg Prihodko and Milos Karol will square off in the qualifications of the Rovereto Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Milos Karol who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Milos Karol is the pick to win this match.
Milos Karol -> 1.57
Oleg Prihodko -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Oleg Prihodko vs. Milos Karol
There is no head to head record between Oleg Prihodko and Milos Karol since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Oleg Prihodko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 64-17 | 8-4 | 44-9 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 8-4 | 18-21 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 2-3 | 43-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-33 | 4-3 | 39-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 355, Prihodko reached the qualifications after defeating Peter Buldorini 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Buldorini (7-5 6-1). During the match, Prihodko scored 65 points vs Buldorini’s 47. Oleg was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Prihodko managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Oleg Prihodko was extremely effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Ukrainian broke Buldorini 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Prihodko has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (318-223). 5-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Prihodko has an overall5-4 match record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
The Ukrainian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island,M15 Heraklion,M15 Antalya,M15 Kursumlijska Banja,M15 Grodzisk Mazowiecki,M15 Kottingbrunn,M15 Slovenj Gradec and M25 Sarreguemines.
Oleg has a composed 61-16 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rovereto Challenger
Milos Karol
53 - 29win/loss
422
419
LLWLWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 53-31 | 8-5 | 21-17 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 28-27 | 3-2 | 11-13 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 6-24 | 3-5 | 1-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-18 | 0-0 | 10-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 439 (career-high), the Slovakian got to the qualifications after beating Filiberto Fumagalli 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, Karol had a good straight sets win against Fumagalli (6-2 7-5). During the match Karol scored 75 points vs Fumagalli’s 53. Milos was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Karol struck 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Milos Karol was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Milos broke Fumagalli 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Karol’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Vienna,M15 Pardubice,M15 Trnava and M25 Trnava.
The Slovakian has a composed 53-29 win-loss record in 2024, 24-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rovereto Challenger
Milos has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Prihodko | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
| Pts | 65-47 | 75-53 |
| Total Points | 112 | 128 |
| Winners | 24 | 28 |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% |
Both Prihodko and Karol played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Prihodko and Karol have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Prihodko played 1 game less than Karol. Oleg scored 24 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Karol struck 28 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Prihodko | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 13 |
| 1st in | 33/49 | 34/53 |
| %1st in | 67% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 28/34 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 13/19 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 68% |
Prihodko struck 4 aces . Karol managed to score 13 aces . Prihodko won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Karol won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Prihodko | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/11 |
| % Converted | 56% | 27% |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Prihodko broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Ukrainian dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Karol broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Milos was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Prihodko | |||
| Q1 Buldorini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-47 | 65-47 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/49 | 33/49 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Karol | |||
| Q1 Fumagalli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 75-53 | 75-53 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 34/53 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWWL
LLWLWWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jules MarieMarie – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bogdan PavelPavel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-1) – H2H and prediction
