Gerard Campana Lee and Eric Vanshelboim will play each other in the qualifications of the Montemar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gerard Campana Lee who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gerard Campana Lee is the pick to win this match.
Gerard Campana Lee -> 1.31
Eric Vanshelboim -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gerard Campana Lee vs. Eric Vanshelboim
There is no head to head record between Gerard Campana Lee and Eric Vanshelboim since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Gerard Campana Lee
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-31 | 0-0 | 31-31 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 1-3 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 373, the Korean reached the qualifications after defeating Stijn Slump 7-6(6) 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Korean had a good straight sets win against Slump (7-66 6-3). During the match, Campana Lee scored 81 points vs Slump’s 71. The Korean was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Campana Lee scored just 1 ace and he committed only 3 double faults. Gerard Campana Lee lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Campana Lee put 63% of his first serves in, winning 66% (33/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. Gerard broke Slump 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Campana Lee has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 52% of his matches (63-57). 29-29 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Campana Lee has a compiled62-54 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Campana Lee’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Skopje Challenger and the Szczecin Challenger.
Gerard has a compiled 29-29 win-loss record in 2024, 29-29 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montemar Challenger
Campana Lee has never competed in this tournament before.
Eric Vanshelboim
39 - 30win/loss
532
357
LLWLLLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-32 | 11-7 | 28-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-25 | 6-2 | 50-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-24 | 4-5 | 39-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-20 | 12-4 | 26-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-11 | 4-4 | 14-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 528, Vanshelboim got to the qualifications after beating Daniel Merida Aguilar 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Eric had a good straight sets win against Merida Aguilar (6-2 6-3). During the match Vanshelboim scored 68 points vs Merida Aguilar’s 44. The Ukrainian was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Vanshelboim couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Eric Vanshelboim was very efficient on serve to win 85% (22/26) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Ukrainian broke Merida Aguilar 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Eric’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Bhopal,M25 Chennai,M25 Brazzaville and M25 Oldenzaal.
Eric has a compiled 39-30 win-loss record in 2024, 28-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Campana Lee | Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 |
| Pts | 81-71 | 68-44 |
| Total Points | 152 | 112 |
| Winners | 33 | 22 |
| %Winners | 41% | 32% |
Both Campana Lee and Vanshelboim played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Campana Lee and Vanshelboim have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Campana Lee played 5 games more than Vanshelboim. Gerard scored 33 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian recorded 22 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Campana Lee | Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 50/79 | 26/43 |
| %1st in | 63% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 22/26 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 10/17 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 59% |
Campana Lee recorded 1 ace . Vanshelboim didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Campana Lee won 66% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Vanshelboim won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Campana Lee | Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 42% |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 |
| Saved | 6 | 3 |
| % Saved | 86% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Gerard broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Campana Lee conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Vanshelboim broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Eric conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Campana Lee | |||
| Q1 Slump |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 81-71 | 81-71 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 50/79 | 50/79 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Vanshelboim | |||
| Q1 Merida |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-44 | 68-44 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 22/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWLWL
LLWLLLWWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Carlos TabernerTaberner (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Miguel DamasDamas (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
