Aidan Mayo and Patrick Zahraj will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Drummondville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Aidan Mayo who should win in 3 sets.
Aidan Mayo -> 1.43
Patrick Zahraj -> 2.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Aidan Mayo vs. Patrick Zahraj
There is no head to head record between Aidan Mayo and Patrick Zahraj since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Aidan Mayo
21 - 30win/loss
437
269
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-30 | 11-16 | 4-4 | 5-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, Mayo reached the semifinal after defeating Aleksandar Kovacevic 2-6 7-6(3) 2-1 ret., Alexis Galarneau 6-2 1-6 6-4 and Joel Schwaerzler 6-3 6-4.
In the quarter, Aidan had a good straight sets win against Schwaerzler (6-3 6-4). During the match, Mayo scored 64 points vs Schwaerzler’s 49. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mayo blasted 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Aidan Mayo was quite effective on serve to win 81% (35/43) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mayo was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Schwaerzler twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Aidan has conceded 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Mayo has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 55% of his matches (114-95). 5-9 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mayo has an aggregate28-20 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Aidan has a compiled 21-30 win-loss record in 2024, 5-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Drummondville Challenger
Mayo has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Zahraj
42 - 29win/loss
552
552
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 42-29 | 9-5 | 17-15 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 552 (career-high), Patrick got to the semifinal after defeating Benjamin Thomas George 6-4 7-6(7), Karl Poling 6-2 6-2, Andre Ilagan 6-3 6-2, Aziz Dougaz 6-3 4-2 ret. and Daniel Masur 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3.
In the quarter, Patrick defeated Masur (6-4 6-74 6-3). During the match Zahraj scored 122 points vs Masur’s 109. Zahraj was very aggressive to blast 56 winners.
About the serving games, Zahraj blasted 8 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Patrick Zahraj lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Zahraj put 67% of his first serves in, winning 66% (56/85) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (16/41) on the 2nd serve. Patrick broke Masur 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Zahraj’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Klosters.
Zahraj has an overall 42-29 win-loss record in 2024, 14-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mayo | Zahraj |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 5 |
Tot Set | 9 | 12 |
Tot Games | 68 | 103 |
Pts | 229-207 | 396-314 |
Total Points | 436 | 710 |
Winners | 96 | 164 |
%Winners | 42% | 41% |
Mayo played 3 matches while Zahraj competed in 5 matches. Zahraj started his run from the qualifications while Mayo had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Aidan Mayo dropped 2 sets, while Patrick Zahraj surrendered 1 set. Mayo has played 3 set(s) less than Zahraj (9 vs 12). Therefore, Mayo played 35 games less than Zahraj. Mayo scored 96 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick blasted 164 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mayo | Zahraj |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 13 |
Avg per match | 2.3 | 2.6 |
1st in | 130/210 | 238/360 |
%1st in | 62% | 66% |
1st pts | 96/130 | 164/238 |
%1st pts | 74% | 69% |
2nd pts | 42/80 | 52/122 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 43% |
Mayo managed to score 7 aces (2.3 per match). Zahraj bagged 13 aces (2.6 per match). Mayo won 74% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Zahraj won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mayo | Zahraj |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 27 |
Converted | 8/20 | 27/47 |
% Converted | 40% | 57% |
Conceded | 15 | 33 |
Saved | 9 | 19 |
% Saved | 60% | 58% |
Times Broken | 6 | 14 |
Aidan broke his opponents 8 times with a 40% conversion rate. Mayo surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 27 times with a 57% conversion rate. Zahraj conceded his serve 14 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
Mayo | |||||
R1 Kovacevic | R2 Galarneau | 1/4 Schwaerzler | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 7-63 2-1 ret. | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 25 | 19 | 68 | |
pts | 88-85 | 77-73 | 64-49 | 229-207 | |
Total points | 173 | 150 | 113 | 436 | |
Winners | 36 | 25 | 35 | 96 | |
%Winners | 41% | 32% | 55% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 51/82 | 36/66 | 43/62 | 130/210 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 55% | 69% | 62% | |
1st pts | 36/51 | 25/36 | 35/43 | 96/130 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 69% | 81% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 18/31 | 14/30 | 10/19 | 42/80 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 47% | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | |
Converted | 1/8 | 5/10 | 2/2 | 8/20 | |
Converted % | 13% | 50% | 100% | 40% | |
Conceded | 4 | 6 | 5 | 15 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2/6 | 5/5 | 9 | |
Saved % | 50% | 33% | 100% | 61% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
Zahraj | |||||||
Q1 Thomas | Q3 Poling | R1 Ilagan | R2 Dougaz | 1/4 Masur | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-67 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 4-2 ret. | 6-4 6-74 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 103 | |
pts | 86-79 | 61-42 | 66-47 | 61-37 | 122-109 | 396-314 | |
Total points | 165 | 103 | 113 | 98 | 231 | 710 | |
Winners | 42 | 26 | 19 | 21 | 56 | 164 | |
%Winners | 49% | 43% | 29% | 34% | 46% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 19 | |
1st in | 61/89 | 37/53 | 27/49 | 28/43 | 85/126 | 238/360 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 70% | 55% | 65% | 67% | 66% | |
1st pts | 42/61 | 26/37 | 19/27 | 21/28 | 56/85 | 164/238 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 70% | 70% | 75% | 66% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 9/28 | 7/16 | 9/22 | 11/15 | 16/41 | 52/122 | |
% 2nd pts | 32% | 44% | 41% | 73% | 39% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 4 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 27 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 6/9 | 7/8 | 3/8 | 7/13 | 27/47 | |
Converted % | 44% | 67% | 88% | 38% | 54% | 57% | |
Conceded | 10 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 10 | 33 | |
Saved | 7/10 | 3/5 | 4/7 | 0/1 | 5/10 | 19 | |
Saved % | 70% | 60% | 57% | 0% | 50% | 79% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 14 |
Tennis Scores in Drummondville Challenger
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Karue SellSell (6-75 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Daniel MasurMasur (6-4 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam Draxl/Cleeve HarperDraxl/Cleeve Harper – Nicolas Mejia/Duarte ValeMejia/Duarte Vale (7-5 6-74 10-8) – See score progression
- Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar/Justin BoulaisCarlos Manuel Aguilar/Justin Boulais – Benjamin Thomas George/Alvin Nicholas TudoricaThomas George/Alvin Nicholas Tudorica (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Karue SellSell (6-7(5) 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chris RodeschRodesch – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction