Ethan Quinn and Micah Braswell will face off in the quarter of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:00 pm on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.53
Micah Braswell -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ethan Quinn vs. Micah Braswell
There is no head to head record between Ethan Quinn and Micah Braswell since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Ethan Quinn
31 - 34win/loss
202
202
WWWWWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 240, Quinn reached the quarter after defeating Adam Walton 6-3 6-4 and Hady Habib 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Habib (6-4 6-4). During the match, Quinn scored 65 points vs Habib’s 57. Ethan was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Quinn scored 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Ethan Quinn conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 57% of his first serves in, winning 86% (32/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Quinn was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Habib twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Quinn has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 56% of his matches (85-67). 10-8 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Quinn has an overall21-15 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Ethan’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
Quinn has a compiled 30-34 win-loss record in 2024, 10-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Micah Braswell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-14 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 503 (career-high), Braswell got to the quarter after defeating Evan King 7-5 6-3, Oscar Weightman 6-4 6-1, Jeremy Zhang 5-7 6-3 6-2 and Beibit Zhukayev 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
In the 2nd round against Zhukayev, Braswell recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 7-64).During the match Braswell scored less points (7) than Zhukayev. In fact, the world no. 240 won 85 points vs Zhukayev’s. That means that Braswell was more focused during the important points. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Braswell bagged 5 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Micah Braswell lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Braswell put 57% of his first serves in, winning 77% (43/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (20/42) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Zhukayev 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Micah has a composed 29-13 win-loss record in 2024, 12-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Micah has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Quinn | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 98 |
| Pts | 125-108 | 317-267 |
| Total Points | 233 | 584 |
| Winners | 66 | 130 |
| %Winners | 53% | 41% |
Quinn played 2 matches while Braswell competed in 4 matches. Braswell started his run from the qualifications while Quinn had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Micah Braswell lost 2 sets while Ethan Quinn hasn’t conceded a set so far. Quinn has played 6 set(s) less than Braswell (4 vs 10). Therefore, Quinn played 59 games less than Braswell. The American scored 66 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Micah blasted 130 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Quinn | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 5.8 |
| 1st in | 80/125 | 167/303 |
| %1st in | 64% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 66/80 | 130/167 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 77/136 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 57% |
Quinn made 16 aces (8 per match). Braswell struck 23 aces (5.8 per match). Quinn won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Braswell won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Quinn | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 13/29 |
| % Converted | 80% | 45% |
| Conceded | 8 | 20 |
| Saved | 8 | 14 |
| % Saved | 100% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
The American broke his opponents 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 8 break points. The American broke his opponents 13 times with a 45% conversion rate. Braswell conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Quinn | ||||
| R1 Walton |
R2 Habib |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 | 39 | |
| pts | 60-51 | 65-57 | 125-108 | |
| Total points | 111 | 122 | 233 | |
| Winners | 34 | 32 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 49% | 53% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 7 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 43/60 | 37/65 | 80/125 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 57% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 34/43 | 32/37 | 66/80 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 86% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 14/28 | 23/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 50% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/2 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 100% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 6/6 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Braswell | ||||||
| Q1 King |
Q3 Weightman |
R1 Zhang |
R2 Zhukayev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 6-1 | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 17 | 29 | 31 | 98 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 61-37 | 102-83 | 85-92 | 317-267 | |
| Total points | 124 | 98 | 185 | 177 | 584 | |
| Winners | 28 | 27 | 32 | 43 | 130 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 44% | 31% | 51% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 35/70 | 31/49 | 45/86 | 56/98 | 167/303 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 63% | 52% | 57% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 27/31 | 32/45 | 43/56 | 130/167 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 87% | 71% | 77% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/35 | 11/18 | 25/41 | 20/42 | 77/136 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 61% | 61% | 48% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/9 | 5/11 | 3/4 | 13/29 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 33% | 45% | 75% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 20 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 2/2 | 3/6 | 5/8 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 50% | 63% | 157% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLLWWL
LWWWWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- James Davis/James MackinlayDavis/James Mackinlay – Hans Hach Verdugo/Szymon WalkowHach Verdugo/Szymon Walkow (3-6 6-3 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
