Aidan Mchugh and Kenta Miyoshi will play each other in the 2nd round of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Aidan Mchugh who should win in 3 sets.
Aidan Mchugh -> 1.67
Kenta Miyoshi -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Aidan Mchugh vs. Kenta Miyoshi
There is no head to head record between Aidan Mchugh and Kenta Miyoshi since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Aidan Mchugh
32 - 30win/loss
498
298
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-30 | 20-15 | 1-1 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 2-1 |
2023 | 52-30 | 39-20 | 0-0 | 13-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-26 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 23-12 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 52-28 | 34-15 | 7-5 | 10-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-13 | 4-8 | 3-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 498, Aidan reached the 2nd round after beating Learner Tien 6-2 4-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Brit defeated Tien (6-2 4-6 7-5). During the match, Mchugh scored 107 points vs Tien’s 91. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mchugh made 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Aidan Mchugh lost the serve 4 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Mchugh put 72% of his first serves in, winning 65% (48/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Mchugh broke Tien 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Mchugh has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (265-180). 8-10 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mchugh has an overall69-54 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Mchugh’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 East Lansing.
The Brit has a compiled 32-30 win-loss record in 2024, 8-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Kenta Miyoshi
22 - 11win/loss
765
765
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-11 | 12-6 | 2-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 10-11 | 7-9 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 9-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 765 (career-high), Kenta got to the 2nd round after defeating Evgeny Karlovskiy 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Karlovskiy (6-1 6-2). During the match Miyoshi scored 53 points vs Karlovskiy’s 24. Kenta was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Miyoshi scored 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kenta Miyoshi was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 73% (8/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Japanese broke Karlovskiy 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Kenta has an aggregate 22-11 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mchugh | Miyoshi |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 30 | 15 |
Pts | 107-91 | 53-24 |
Total Points | 198 | 77 |
Winners | 48 | 22 |
%Winners | 45% | 42% |
Both Mchugh and Miyoshi played 1 match. At the moment, Aidan Mchugh surrendered 1 set while Kenta Miyoshi hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mchugh has played 1 set more than Miyoshi (3 vs 2). Therefore, Mchugh played 15 games more than Miyoshi. Mchugh scored 48 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese recorded 22 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mchugh | Miyoshi |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 6 |
Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
1st in | 74/103 | 28/39 |
%1st in | 72% | 72% |
1st pts | 48/74 | 22/28 |
%1st pts | 65% | 79% |
2nd pts | 14/29 | 8/11 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 73% |
Mchugh managed to score 4 aces . Miyoshi scored 6 aces . Mchugh won 65% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Miyoshi won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 73% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mchugh | Miyoshi |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 5 |
Converted | 6/11 | 5/6 |
% Converted | 55% | 83% |
Conceded | 15 | 1 |
Saved | 11 | 0 |
% Saved | 73% | 0% |
Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The Brit broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Brit lost his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Kenta broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Miyoshi conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Mchugh | |||
R1 Tien | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 107-91 | 107-91 | |
Total points | 198 | 198 | |
Winners | 48 | 48 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 74/103 | 74/103 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
1st pts | 48/74 | 48/74 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 14/29 | 14/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
Saved | 11/15 | 11 | |
Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Miyoshi | |||
R1 Karlovskiy | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 53-24 | 53-24 | |
Total points | 77 | 77 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 28/39 | 28/39 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 8/11 | 8/11 | |
% 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Jeremy ZhangZhang (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Learner TienTien (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Ezekiel ClarkClark (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Francis Casey Alcantara/Sai Karteek Reddy GantaCasey Alcantara/Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta – Toby Alex Kodat/Kelsey StevensonAlex Kodat/Kelsey Stevenson (6-4 3-6 10-3) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Tyler ZinkZink (5-7 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Felix CorwinCorwin (6-0 7-64) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Henry SearleSearle (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Mark LajalLajal (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (4-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – William Mroz MrozMroz Mroz (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jay ClarkeClarke – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (1-0) – H2H and prediction