Ethan Quinn and Hady Habib will square off in the 2nd round of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on THE GOLDENBERG COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.49
Hady Habib -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ethan Quinn vs. Hady Habib
There is no head to head record between Ethan Quinn and Hady Habib since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Ethan Quinn
30 - 34win/loss
204
204
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 240, Quinn got to the 2nd round after beating Adam Walton 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Walton (6-3 6-4). During the match, Quinn scored 60 points vs Walton’s 51. Ethan was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Quinn scored 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ethan Quinn was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (34/43) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Quinn broke Walton twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Quinn has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 56% of his matches (84-67). 9-8 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Quinn has a compiled20-15 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Ethan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
The American has an overall 29-34 win-loss record in 2024, 9-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Hady Habib
40 - 34win/loss
300
259
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 40-34 | 14-10 | 25-21 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 58-27 | 38-11 | 17-10 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-25 | 21-14 | 9-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 40-13 | 31-10 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-4 | 2-2 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283, Habib got to the 2nd round after defeating Toby Alex Kodat 4-6 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round against Alex Kodat, Hady recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 7-5). During the match Habib scored 91 points vs Alex Kodat’s 77. Hady was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Habib struck 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hady Habib lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Habib put 65% of his first serves in, winning 74% (40/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (12/29) on the 2nd serve. The Lebanese broke Alex Kodat 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Hady’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Quinta Do Lago,the Santos Challenger and M25 Pensacola.
Habib has a composed 40-33 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
The Lebanese has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Quinn | Habib |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 30 |
Pts | 60-51 | 91-77 |
Total Points | 111 | 168 |
Winners | 34 | 40 |
%Winners | 57% | 44% |
Both Quinn and Habib played 1 match. At the moment, Hady Habib dropped 1 set while Ethan Quinn hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Quinn has played 1 set(s) less than Habib (2 vs 3). Therefore, Quinn played 11 games less than Habib. Quinn scored 34 winners (57% of the total points). On the other side, Hady bagged 40 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Quinn | Habib |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 9 |
Avg per match | 9 | 9 |
1st in | 43/60 | 54/83 |
%1st in | 72% | 65% |
1st pts | 34/43 | 40/54 |
%1st pts | 79% | 74% |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 12/29 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 41% |
Quinn made 9 aces . Habib struck 9 aces . Quinn won 79% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Habib won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Quinn | Habib |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 6 |
Converted | 2/3 | 6/9 |
% Converted | 67% | 67% |
Conceded | 2 | 7 |
Saved | 2 | 3 |
% Saved | 100% | 43% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Ethan broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Ethan quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Hady broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Habib conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
Quinn | |||
R1 Walton | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 60-51 | 60-51 | |
Total points | 111 | 111 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 57% | 57% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 43/60 | 43/60 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
1st pts | 34/43 | 34/43 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Habib | |||
R1 Alex | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 91-77 | 91-77 | |
Total points | 168 | 168 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 54/83 | 54/83 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 40/54 | 40/54 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 12/29 | 12/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Tyler ZinkZink (5-7 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Learner TienTien (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Ezekiel ClarkClark (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Jeremy ZhangZhang (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Felix CorwinCorwin (6-0 7-64) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Henry SearleSearle (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Mark LajalLajal (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (4-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Jeremy ZhangZhang (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Learner TienTien (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-6 7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Ezekiel ClarkClark (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jay ClarkeClarke – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (1-0) – H2H and prediction