Tyler Bowers and Felix Corwin will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Felix Corwin who should win in 2 sets.
Felix Corwin -> 1.196
Tyler Bowers -> 4.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tyler Bowers vs. Felix Corwin
There is no head to head record between Tyler Bowers and Felix Corwin since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tyler Bowers
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 5-5 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-7 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Tyler reached the qualifications after defeating Karlis Ozolins 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Bowers had a good straight sets win against Ozolins (6-3 7-5). During the match, Bowers scored 84 points vs Ozolins’s 69. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bowers scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Tyler Bowers was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (29/38) of his 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Ozolins 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Bowers has a negative match record in the last 3 years having won 31% of his matches (8-18). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Bowers has a compiled2-3 record in the last 3 years on indoor hard courts.
Bowers has an aggregate 5-4 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Felix Corwin
31 - 20win/loss
577
478
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-22 | 9-6 | 17-11 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 28-13 | 8-3 | 15-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 21-14 | 9-5 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-30 | 24-20 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2020 | 21-15 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 600, Felix got to the qualifications after beating Mathis Debru 7-5 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Corwin defeated Debru (7-5 3-6 6-4). During the match Corwin scored 108 points vs Debru’s 103. Corwin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Corwin managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Felix Corwin was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (32/43) of his 1st serve and 60% (25/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Corwin broke Debru 3 times after converting 18% of his break points (3/17).
Corwin’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Slovenska Bistrica and M15 Ann Arbor.
Felix has an overall 30-20 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Bowers | Corwin |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 21 | 31 |
Pts | 84-69 | 108-103 |
Total Points | 153 | 211 |
Winners | 29 | 32 |
%Winners | 35% | 30% |
Both Bowers and Corwin played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Felix Corwin surrendered 1 set while Tyler Bowers hasn’t dropped a set so far. Bowers has played 1 set(s) less than Corwin (2 vs 3). Therefore, Bowers played 10 games less than Corwin. Bowers scored 29 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 32 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Bowers | Corwin |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 2 |
Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
1st in | 38/68 | 43/85 |
%1st in | 56% | 51% |
1st pts | 29/38 | 32/43 |
%1st pts | 76% | 74% |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 25/42 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 60% |
Bowers fired 1 ace . Corwin also made 2 aces . Bowers won 76% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Corwin won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Bowers | Corwin |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/12 | 3/17 |
% Converted | 25% | 18% |
Conceded | 2 | 4 |
Saved | 2 | 2 |
% Saved | 100% | 50% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Bowers broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 18% conversion rate. Felix conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Bowers | |||
Q1 Ozolins | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 84-69 | 84-69 | |
Total points | 153 | 153 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 38/68 | 38/68 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 29/38 | 29/38 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Corwin | |||
Q1 Debru | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 108-103 | 108-103 | |
Total points | 211 | 211 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 30% | 30% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 43/85 | 43/85 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 25/42 | 25/42 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/17 | 3/17 | |
Converted % | 18% | 18% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix CorwinCorwin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Oscar WeightmanWeightman (0-0) – H2H and prediction