Hazem Naw and Oleg Prihodko will play each other in the qualifications of the Lyon Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hazem Naw who should win in 3 sets.
Hazem Naw -> 1.52
Oleg Prihodko -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hazem Naw vs. Oleg Prihodko
This will be the 3rd time that Hazem Naw and Oleg Prihodko play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Naw and Prihodko (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Naw won 6-0 6-4
in the final in M15 Kish Island back in January 2024.Hazem Naw
44 - 24win/loss
303
299
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-25 | 9-4 | 13-10 | 19-10 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2023 | 48-24 | 17-5 | 25-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 5-4 |
| 2022 | 23-17 | 14-6 | 8-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 42-18 | 32-13 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 302, Naw got to the qualifications after defeating Matisse Bobichon 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Naw had a good straight sets win against Bobichon (6-3 6-2). During the match, Naw scored 61 points vs Bobichon’s 45. The Syrian was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Naw scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Hazem Naw was exceptionally effective on serve to win 74% (26/35) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Naw broke Bobichon 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Naw has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 65% of his matches (166-91). 19-9 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Naw has an aggregate22-12 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Hazem’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island and M15 Metzingen.
Hazem has a compiled 44-24 win-loss record in 2024, 19-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lyon Challenger
Naw has never competed in this tournament before.
Oleg Prihodko
58 - 15win/loss
341
341
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 63-16 | 8-4 | 44-9 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 8-4 | 18-21 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 2-3 | 43-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-33 | 4-3 | 39-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 356, the Ukrainian reached the qualifications after defeating Timothee Lustig 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Lustig (6-3 6-4). During the match Prihodko scored 64 points vs Lustig’s 43. The Ukrainian was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Prihodko struck 9 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Oleg Prihodko was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Oleg broke Lustig 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Ukrainian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island,M15 Heraklion,M15 Antalya,M15 Kursumlijska Banja,M15 Grodzisk Mazowiecki,M15 Kottingbrunn,M15 Slovenj Gradec and M25 Sarreguemines.
The Ukrainian has an aggregate 58-15 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lyon Challenger
Prihodko has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Naw | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 |
| Pts | 61-45 | 64-43 |
| Total Points | 106 | 107 |
| Winners | 26 | 24 |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% |
Both Naw and Prihodko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Naw and Prihodko have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Naw played 2 games less than Prihodko. The Syrian scored 26 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian managed to score 24 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Naw | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 35/54 | 33/52 |
| %1st in | 65% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 24/33 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 13/19 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 68% |
Naw bagged 1 ace . Prihodko also managed to score 9 aces . Naw won 74% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Prihodko won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Naw | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Syrian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Naw pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. Prihodko broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Prihodko conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Naw | |||
| Q1 Bobichon | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-45 | 61-45 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/54 | 35/54 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Prihodko | |||
| Q1 Lustig | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 33/52 | 33/52 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Maxime ChazalChazal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction