Jacob Fearnley and Emilio Nava will fight against each other in the 2^nd round of the Helsinki Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.3
Emilio Nava -> 3.26

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Jacob Fearnley vs. Emilio Nava

There is no head to head record between Jacob Fearnley and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.

Jacob Fearnley

Ranked no. 94, the Brit reached the 2^nd round after defeating Valentin Royer 6-2 6-3.

In the 1^st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Royer (6-2 6-3). During the match, Fearnley scored 66 points vs Royer’s 49. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.

Talking about the service games, Fearnley recorded 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jacob Fearnley conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Fearnley put 65% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Royer 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).

Fearnley has a fantastic record in the last 4 years having won 80% of his matches (72-18). 25-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Fearnley has an aggregate42-7 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.

His best result of the year was winning the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he beat Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3 and the Lincoln Challenger where he defeated Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 6-4 6-2 and the Rennes Challenger where he overcame Quentin Halys in the final 0-6 7-6(5) 6-3 and the Orleans Challenger where he overcame Harold Mayot in the final 6-3 7-6(5).

The Brit has an aggregate 44-8 win-loss record in 2024, 25-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Helsinki Challenger

Jacob has never competed in this tournament before.

Emilio Nava

Ranked no. 200, the American got to the 2^nd round after defeating Alibek Kachmazov 6-1 6-2.

In the 1^st round, Nava had a good straight sets win against Kachmazov (6-1 6-2). During the match Nava scored 53 points vs Kachmazov’s 26. Nava was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.

Talking about serving, Nava scored 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kachmazov 5 times.

Nava’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Lisbon Challenger.

Nava has an aggregate 34-33 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)

.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Fearnley	Nava
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	17	15
Pts	66-49	53-26
Total Points	115	79
Winners	23	21
%Winners	35%	40%

Both Fearnley and Nava played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fearnley and Nava have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fearnley played 2 games more than Nava. The Brit scored 23 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Nava recorded 21 winners (40%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Fearnley	Nava
Aces	3	2
Avg per match	3	2
1st in	33/51	27/45
%1st in	65%	60%
1st pts	23/33	21/27
%1st pts	70%	78%
2nd pts	13/18	11/18
%2nd pts	72%	61%

Fearnley fired 3 aces . Nava scored 2 aces . Fearnley won 70% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Fearnley	Nava
Won	4	5
Converted	4/8	5/5
% Converted	50%	100%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	4	3
% Saved	100%	75%
Times Broken	0	1

Jacob broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Brit extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. Emilio broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Nava conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.

Fearnley
	R1 Royer	Total
Score	6-2 6-3
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	17	17
pts	66-49	66-49
Total points	115	115
Winners	23	23
%Winners	35%	35%
SERVE
Aces	3	3
Double Faults	3	3
1st in	33/51	33/51
% 1st in	65%	65%
1st pts	23/33	23/33
% 1st pts	70%	70%
2nd pts	13/18	13/18
% 2nd pts	72%	72%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/8	4/8
Converted %	50%	50%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	4/4	4
Saved %	100%	100%
Times Broken	0	0

Nava
	R1 Kachmazov	Total
Score	6-1 6-2
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	15	15
pts	53-26	53-26
Total points	79	79
Winners	21	21
%Winners	40%	40%
SERVE
Aces	2	2
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	27/45	27/45
% 1st in	60%	60%
1st pts	21/27	21/27
% 1st pts	78%	78%
2nd pts	11/18	11/18
% 2nd pts	61%	61%
Breaks
Won	5	5
Converted	5/5	5/5
Converted %	100%	100%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	3/4	3
Saved %	75%	75%
Times Broken	1	1

Tennis Scores in Helsinki Challenger

• Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Alexis GautierGautier (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Sandro KoppKopp (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
• Henri SquireSquire – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Patrick KaukovaltaKaukovalta – Oskari PaldaniusPaldanius (6-3 4-6 7-6⁶) – See score progression
• Jerome KymKym – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
• Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Maximilian MartererMarterer – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Emilio NavaNava – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
• Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
• Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Oliver OjakaarOjakaar (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
• Henri SquireSquire – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Alexis GautierGautier (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Maximilian MartererMarterer – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Jerome KymKym – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
• Patrick KaukovaltaKaukovalta – Oskari PaldaniusPaldanius (6-3 4-6 7-6(6)) – See score progression
• Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Sandro KoppKopp (6-2 6-1) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Kei NishikoriNishikori – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• August HolmgrenHolmgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Henri SquireSquire – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
• Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction