Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Alex Bolt will face off in the 2nd round of the Matsuyama Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.83
Alex Bolt -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Alex Bolt
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Alex Bolt since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
38 - 32win/loss
170
128
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 159, Lam Coleman Wong got to the 2nd round after defeating Chun Hsin Tseng 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Hsin Tseng (6-2 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 65 points vs Hsin Tseng’s 47. The was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong made 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 46% of his first serves in, winning 89% (25/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. The broke Hsin Tseng 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (129-96). 36-23 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate106-69 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Chak has a composed 38-32 win-loss record in 2024, 36-23 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Matsuyama Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Alex Bolt
44 - 23win/loss
157
125
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-26 | 26-21 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 21-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-22 | 22-17 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 11-10 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-18 | 7-6 | 0-7 | 2-2 | 10-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-12 | 12-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 179, Bolt got to the 2nd round after defeating Matej Dodig 6-2 3-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Dodig, Alex had a free pass after Dodig retired on a 6-2 3-0 . scoreline.
Alex’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Burnie 1 Challenger,M25 Traralgon,M25 Mildura and M25 Swan Hill.
Alex has a compiled 44-23 win-loss record in 2024, 23-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Bolt |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 16 | 11 |
Pts | 65-47 | 43-24 |
Total Points | 112 | 67 |
Winners | 25 | 14 |
%Winners | 38% | 33% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Bolt played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Bolt (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Lam Coleman Wong played 5 games more than Bolt. Lam Coleman Wong scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian recorded 14 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Bolt |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 4 |
Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
1st in | 28/61 | 17/28 |
%1st in | 46% | 61% |
1st pts | 25/28 | 14/17 |
%1st pts | 89% | 82% |
2nd pts | 15/33 | 7/11 |
%2nd pts | 45% | 64% |
Lam Coleman Wong scored 8 aces . Bolt managed to score 4 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 89% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Bolt won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Bolt |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 50% | 44% |
Conceded | 6 | 3 |
Saved | 6 | 3 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Chak had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 6 break points. Bolt broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Bolt was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
Lam Coleman Wong | |||
R1 Hsin Tseng | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 65-47 | 65-47 | |
Total points | 112 | 112 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 28/61 | 28/61 | |
% 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
2nd pts | 15/33 | 15/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Bolt | |||
R1 Dodig | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 11 | 11 | |
pts | 43-24 | 43-24 | |
Total points | 67 | 67 | |
Winners | 14 | 14 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 14/17 | 14/17 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Tennis Scores in Matsuyama Challenger
- James McCabeMcCabe – Benoit PairePaire (6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kokoro IsomuraIsomura – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yi ZhouZhou (5-7 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Yaroslav DeminDemin (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Dane SweenySweeny (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Alafia AyeniAyeni (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Shunsuke NakagawaNakagawa (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Sho KatayamaKatayama (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Matej DodigDodig (6-2 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-3 6-75 6-4) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Kokoro IsomuraIsomura – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-1 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yi ZhouZhou (5-7 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Yaroslav DeminDemin (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Benoit PairePaire (6-7(2) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Dane SweenySweeny (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Alafia AyeniAyeni (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – (0-0) – H2H and prediction