Gabriel Diallo and Raphael Collignon will clash against each other in the quarter of the Bratislava 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 8:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gabriel Diallo who should win in 2 sets.
Gabriel Diallo -> 1.38
Raphael Collignon -> 2.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Gabriel Diallo vs. Raphael Collignon
There is no head to head record between Gabriel Diallo and Raphael Collignon since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Gabriel Diallo
49 - 24win/loss
89
87
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 49-24 | 30-12 | 7-6 | 9-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-28 | 8-11 | 2-2 | 24-10 | 5-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-10 | 17-6 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-4 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 89, Diallo reached the quarter after beating Zsombor Piros 6-1 7-5 and Pierre-Hugues Herbert 6-2 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Diallo had a good straight sets win against Herbert (6-2 6-4). During the match, Diallo scored 64 points vs Herbert’s 40. The Canadian was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Diallo fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Gabriel Diallo was exceptionally effective on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Diallo broke Herbert 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Canadian hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to win 61% of the points he played.
Diallo has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (133-74). 9-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Diallo has a compiled46-21 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Chicago Challenger where he beat Bu Yunchaokete in the final 6-3 7-6(3).
The Canadian has a composed 49-24 win-loss record in 2024, 9-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 2 Challenger
Raphael Collignon
65 - 21win/loss
167
164
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 65-21 | 5-3 | 46-8 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 61-22 | 14-4 | 38-12 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 20-20 | 11-11 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 167, Raphael got to the quarter after beating Jelle Sels 6-4 6-2, Adrian Andreev 6-4 7-5, Hamad Medjedovic 6-3 3-6 6-3 and Emilio Nava 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round against Nava, Raphael recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-3 7-5). During the match Collignon scored 108 points vs Nava’s 98. The Belgian was quite aggressive to blast 60 winners.
Talking about serving, Collignon recorded 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Raphael Collignon was very effective on serve to win 74% (60/81) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Belgian broke Nava 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Raphael started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Luedenscheid Challenger where he overcame Botic Van De Zandschulp in the final 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Raphael has an aggregate 65-21 win-loss record in 2024, 14-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Diallo | Collignon |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
Tot Games | 37 | 101 |
Pts | 129-81 | 326-264 |
Total Points | 210 | 590 |
Winners | 55 | 151 |
%Winners | 43% | 46% |
Diallo played 2 matches while Collignon competed in 4 matches. Collignon started his run from the qualifications while Diallo had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Raphael Collignon dropped 2 sets while Gabriel Diallo hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Diallo has played 6 set(s) less than Collignon (4 vs 10). Therefore, Diallo played 64 games less than Collignon. Gabriel scored 55 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Collignon fired 151 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Diallo | Collignon |
---|---|---|
Aces | 20 | 24 |
Avg per match | 10 | 6 |
1st in | 70/104 | 203/292 |
%1st in | 67% | 70% |
1st pts | 55/70 | 151/203 |
%1st pts | 79% | 74% |
2nd pts | 25/34 | 62/89 |
%2nd pts | 74% | 70% |
Diallo blasted 20 aces (10 per match). Collignon recorded 24 aces (6 per match). Diallo won 79% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Collignon won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Diallo | Collignon |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 12 |
Converted | 7/11 | 12/24 |
% Converted | 64% | 50% |
Conceded | 5 | 8 |
Saved | 4 | 4 |
% Saved | 80% | 50% |
Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Diallo broke his opponents 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Diallo conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. Raphael conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Diallo | ||||
R1 Piros | R2 Herbert | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-5 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 18 | 37 | |
pts | 65-41 | 64-40 | 129-81 | |
Total points | 106 | 104 | 210 | |
Winners | 28 | 27 | 55 | |
%Winners | 43% | 42% | 43% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 13 | 7 | 20 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 35/54 | 35/50 | 70/104 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 70% | 67% | |
1st pts | 28/35 | 27/35 | 55/70 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 77% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 15/19 | 10/15 | 25/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 79% | 67% | 74% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 4/8 | 7/11 | |
Converted % | 100% | 50% | 64% | |
Conceded | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 1/2 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | 50% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Collignon | ||||||
Q1 Sels | Q3 Andreev | R1 Medjedovic | R2 Nava | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | 6-73 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 101 | |
pts | 62-38 | 72-63 | 84-65 | 108-98 | 326-264 | |
Total points | 100 | 135 | 149 | 206 | 590 | |
Winners | 25 | 30 | 36 | 60 | 151 | |
%Winners | 40% | 42% | 43% | 56% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 24 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
1st in | 32/45 | 46/74 | 44/70 | 81/103 | 203/292 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 62% | 63% | 79% | 70% | |
1st pts | 25/32 | 30/46 | 36/44 | 60/81 | 151/203 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 65% | 82% | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 12/13 | 16/28 | 20/26 | 14/22 | 62/89 | |
% 2nd pts | 92% | 57% | 77% | 64% | 70% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 4/8 | 2/3 | 3/9 | 12/24 | |
Converted % | 75% | 50% | 67% | 33% | 50% | |
Conceded | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 2/3 | 4 | |
Saved % | – | 33% | 50% | 67% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (2-3) – H2H and prediction