Federico Agustin Gomez and Ryan Nijboer will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on CANCHA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Agustin Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 1.36
Ryan Nijboer -> 2.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. Ryan Nijboer
This will be the 2nd time that Federico Agustin Gomez and Ryan Nijboer square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Agustin Gomez (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Agustin Gomez won 6-1 6-3 in the 1st round in M15 Sharm ElSheikh back in 2022.
Federico Agustin Gomez
55 - 25win/loss
160
157
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 55-25 | 9-6 | 46-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, Agustin Gomez reached the 2nd round after defeating Mathys Erhard 6-4 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Argentine defeated Erhard (6-4 4-6 6-4). During the match, Agustin Gomez scored 95 points vs Erhard’s 91. Federico was exceptionally aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agustin Gomez blasted 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Federico Agustin Gomez lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Agustin Gomez put 74% of his first serves in, winning 83% (53/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (8/23) on the 2nd serve. Federico broke Erhard twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
Agustin Gomez has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (164-86). 46-19 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Agustin Gomez has an overall104-52 match record in the last 4 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Milan Challenger where he overcame Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Trieste Challenger where he overcame Tomas Barrios Vera in the final 6-1 6-2.
The Argentine has an aggregate 55-25 win-loss record in 2024, 46-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Nijboer
48 - 32win/loss
406
371
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-32 | 8-3 | 40-26 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 55-32 | 12-9 | 41-21 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-23 | 1-6 | 22-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-28 | 9-13 | 18-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 21-17 | 13-7 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 406, Nijboer reached the 2nd round after beating Thiago Cigarran 6-3 6-3, Ignacio Monzon 6-4 5-7 7-5 and Angel Veliz 6-0 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Veliz (6-0 6-1). During the match Nijboer scored 54 points vs Veliz’s 22. The Dutch was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Nijboer couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Ryan Nijboer lost the serve once. Furthermore, Nijboer put 71% of his first serves in, winning 90% (18/20) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (3/8) on the 2nd serve. Ryan broke Veliz 7 times after converting 70% of his break points (7/10).
Ryan’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Manacor,Laukariz,M15 Gijon and M25 Zaragoza.
The Dutch has an overall 48-32 win-loss record in 2024, 40-26 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Agustin Gomez | Nijboer |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 30 | 65 |
Pts | 95-91 | 232-181 |
Total Points | 186 | 413 |
Winners | 53 | 95 |
%Winners | 56% | 41% |
Agustin Gomez played 1 match while Nijboer competed in 3 matches. Nijboer started his run from the qualifications while Agustin Gomez had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Federico Agustin Gomez dropped 1 set, while Ryan Nijboer lost 1 set. Agustin Gomez has played 4 set(s) less than Nijboer (3 vs 7). Therefore, Agustin Gomez played 35 games less than Nijboer. Agustin Gomez scored 53 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, Ryan made 95 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Agustin Gomez | Nijboer |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 10 |
Avg per match | 8 | 3.3 |
1st in | 64/87 | 128/192 |
%1st in | 74% | 67% |
1st pts | 53/64 | 95/128 |
%1st pts | 83% | 74% |
2nd pts | 8/23 | 24/64 |
%2nd pts | 35% | 38% |
Agustin Gomez recorded 8 aces . Nijboer scored 10 aces (3.3 per match). Agustin Gomez won 83% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 35% of the points. On the other side, Nijboer won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Agustin Gomez | Nijboer |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 19 |
Converted | 2/12 | 19/38 |
% Converted | 17% | 50% |
Conceded | 6 | 16 |
Saved | 5 | 7 |
% Saved | 83% | 44% |
Times Broken | 1 | 9 |
The Argentine broke his opponent twice with a 17% conversion rate. Agustin Gomez conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponents 19 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded.
Agustin Gomez | |||
R1 Erhard | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 95-91 | 95-91 | |
Total points | 186 | 186 | |
Winners | 53 | 53 | |
%Winners | 56% | 56% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 64/87 | 64/87 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
1st pts | 53/64 | 53/64 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 8/23 | 8/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 35% | 35% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/12 | 2/12 | |
Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Nijboer | |||||
Q1 Cigarran | Q3 Monzon | R1 Veliz | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 34 | 13 | 65 | |
pts | 64-52 | 114-107 | 54-22 | 232-181 | |
Total points | 116 | 221 | 76 | 413 | |
Winners | 27 | 50 | 18 | 95 | |
%Winners | 42% | 44% | 33% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 9 | 2 | 15 | |
1st in | 37/50 | 71/114 | 20/28 | 128/192 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 62% | 71% | 67% | |
1st pts | 27/37 | 50/71 | 18/20 | 95/128 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 70% | 90% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 3/13 | 18/43 | 3/8 | 24/64 | |
% 2nd pts | 23% | 42% | 38% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 6 | 6 | 7 | 19 | |
Converted | 6/15 | 6/13 | 7/10 | 19/38 | |
Converted % | 40% | 46% | 70% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 9 | 1 | 16 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 4/9 | 0/1 | 7 | |
Saved % | 50% | 44% | 0% | 94% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
Tennis Scores in Guayaquil Challenger
- Federico CoriaCoria – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Henrique RochaRocha – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (7-5 6-75 3-3 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (7-63 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Federico CoriaCoria (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (1-0) – H2H and prediction