Paul Jubb and Chris Rodesch will play each other in the 2nd round of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on BRENDA MYERS COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.35
Chris Rodesch -> 2.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Chris Rodesch
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Chris Rodesch since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
47 - 26win/loss
183
180
LLWLWWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 180 (career-high), Paul reached the 2nd round after defeating Toby Alex Kodat 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Paul had a good straight sets win against Alex Kodat (6-4 6-2). During the match, Jubb scored 64 points vs Alex Kodat’s 43. Paul was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jubb blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (19/26) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jubb broke Alex Kodat 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Jubb has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 69% of his matches (216-96). 12-5 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jubb has a composed28-16 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
Jubb has an aggregate 47-25 win-loss record in 2024, 12-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Chris Rodesch
40 - 8win/loss
385
383
LWWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-9 | 18-1 | 18-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-11 | 5-1 | 12-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 416, Rodesch got to the 2nd round after beating Cooper Williams 6-3 2-6 6-2 and Govind Nanda 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Luxembourger had a good straight sets win against Nanda (6-4 6-3). During the match Rodesch scored 68 points vs Nanda’s 58. The Luxembourger was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Rodesch wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Chris Rodesch lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Rodesch put 67% of his first serves in, winning 67% (30/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (9/22) on the 2nd serve. The Luxembourger broke Nanda 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Chris’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Alkmaar,M25 Esch/Alzette,M15 Ystad,M25 Hong Kong,M15 Hong Kong and M15 Monastir.
Rodesch has a composed 39-8 win-loss record in 2024, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 44 |
| Pts | 64-43 | 155-133 |
| Total Points | 107 | 288 |
| Winners | 19 | 75 |
| %Winners | 30% | 48% |
Jubb played 1 match while Rodesch competed in 2 matches. Rodesch started his run from the qualifications while Jubb had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chris Rodesch surrendered 1 set while Paul Jubb hasn’t conceded a set so far. Jubb has played 3 set(s) less than Rodesch (2 vs 5). Therefore, Jubb played 26 games less than Rodesch. Jubb scored 19 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, The Luxembourger fired 75 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 106/149 |
| %1st in | 58% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 75/106 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 18/43 |
| %2nd pts | 74% | 42% |
Jubb bagged 3 aces . Rodesch recorded 14 aces (7 per match). Jubb won 73% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Rodesch won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 8 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 8/21 |
| % Converted | 57% | 38% |
| Conceded | 1 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Luxembourger broke his opponents 8 times with a 38% conversion rate. Rodesch conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | |||
| R1 Alex |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 26/45 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 14/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Rodesch | |||||
| Q1 Williams |
Q3 Rybakov |
R1 Nanda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 17 | 19 | 61 | |
| pts | 87-75 | – | 68-58 | 155-133 | |
| Total points | 162 | 0 | 126 | 288 | |
| Winners | 45 | 30 | 75 | ||
| %Winners | 52% | 0% | 44% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1st in | 61/82 | / | 45/67 | 106/149 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 0% | 67% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 45/61 | / | 30/45 | 75/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 0% | 67% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | / | 9/22 | 18/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 0% | 41% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | ||
| Converted | 3/8 | / | 5/13 | 8/21 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 0% | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 | 10 | ||
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/ | 3/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 50% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWLL
LWWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Colton SmithSmith – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (6-75 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Brandon HoltHolt (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Learner TienTien – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 7-68) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mark LajalLajal – Patrick KypsonKypson (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
