Antoine Escoffier and Kaito Uesugi will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Antoine Escoffier who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Antoine Escoffier is the pick to win this match.
Antoine Escoffier -> 1.24
Kaito Uesugi -> 3.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Antoine Escoffier vs. Kaito Uesugi
There is no head to head record between Antoine Escoffier and Kaito Uesugi since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Antoine Escoffier
42 - 32win/loss
207
135
WWWLLWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-32 | 32-15 | 0-1 | 11-15 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 21-14 | 1-2 | 17-12 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-33 | 12-12 | 0-2 | 31-16 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 56-26 | 19-8 | 11-8 | 26-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-6 | 8-1 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
Ranked no. 223, the French player got to the 2nd round after defeating Yi Zhou 6-4 3-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, Antoine defeated Zhou (6-4 3-6 6-1). During the match, Escoffier scored 96 points vs Zhou’s 87. Escoffier was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Escoffier scored 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Antoine Escoffier lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Escoffier put 61% of his first serves in, winning 64% (29/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. Antoine broke Zhou 6 times after converting 24% of his break points (6/25).
Escoffier has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (425-263). 30-15 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Escoffier has a composed 232-131 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Segovia Challenger where he overcame Alex Martinez in the final 6-3 2-6 6-3.
Escoffier has an aggregate 42-32 win-loss record in 2024, 30-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Escoffier has never competed in this tournament before.
Kaito Uesugi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-8 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-10 | 7-7 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Japanese got to the 2nd round after beating Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong 6-2 6-3, Seongbin Sim 6-1 2-6 7-5 and Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Kaito had a good straight sets win against Ramanathan (6-4 6-4). During the match Uesugi scored 63 points vs Ramanathan’s 51. The Japanese was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Uesugi bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kaito Uesugi was pretty efficient on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kaito broke Ramanathan 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Uesugi has a composed 10-4 win-loss record in 2024, 8-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Escoffier | Uesugi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 64 |
| Pts | 96-87 | 212-166 |
| Total Points | 183 | 378 |
| Winners | 29 | 82 |
| %Winners | 30% | 39% |
Escoffier played 1 match while Uesugi competed in 3 matches. Uesugi started his run from the qualifications while Escoffier had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Antoine Escoffier lost 1 set, while Kaito Uesugi dropped 1 set. Escoffier has played 4 set(s) less than Uesugi (3 vs 7). Therefore, Escoffier played 38 games less than Uesugi. Escoffier scored 29 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Kaito struck 82 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Escoffier | Uesugi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 45/74 | 115/181 |
| %1st in | 61% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 82/115 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 13/29 | 41/66 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 62% |
Escoffier made 3 aces . Uesugi blasted 4 aces (1.3 per match). Escoffier won 64% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Uesugi won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Escoffier | Uesugi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 12 |
| Converted | 6/25 | 12/22 |
| % Converted | 24% | 55% |
| Conceded | 6 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 33% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 5 |
The French player broke his opponent 6 times with a 24% conversion rate. Escoffier dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Kaito broke his opponents 12 times with a 55% conversion rate. Kaito conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Escoffier | |||
| R1 Zhou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 96-87 | 96-87 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/74 | 45/74 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/29 | 13/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/25 | 6/25 | |
| Converted % | 24% | 24% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Uesugi | |||||
| Q1 Wei Kang Leong |
Q3 Sim |
R1 Ramanathan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-1 2-6 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 27 | 20 | 64 | |
| pts | 55-37 | 94-78 | 63-51 | 212-166 | |
| Total points | 92 | 172 | 114 | 378 | |
| Winners | 18 | 34 | 30 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 36% | 48% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 26/44 | 50/79 | 39/58 | 115/181 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 67% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 34/50 | 30/39 | 82/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 68% | 77% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 18/29 | 11/19 | 41/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 62% | 58% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/8 | 3/6 | 12/22 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 50% | 50% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 1 | 10 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 3/6 | 0/1 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 0% | 117% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLLWLLWL
LWWWLWWLWL Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Alexander BlockxBlockx (7-67 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jurij RodionovJurij – Sho ShimabukuroSho (7-6(3) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Kaito UesugiUesugi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
