Gerard Campana Lee and Tristan Mccormick will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CANCHA RAUL VIVER. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gerard Campana Lee who should win in 2 sets.
Gerard Campana Lee -> 1.164
Tristan Mccormick -> 4.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Gerard Campana Lee vs. Tristan Mccormick
This will be the 2nd time that Gerard Campana Lee and Tristan Mccormick fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Campana Lee (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Campana Lee won 7-5 6-3 in the qualifications in the Sarasota Challenger back in April 2024.
Gerard Campana Lee
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-30 | 0-0 | 30-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 1-3 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 372, the Korean got to the qualifications after beating Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos 4-6 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications against Andre Saraiva Dos, Gerard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 7-5). During the match, Campana Lee scored 101 points vs Andre Saraiva Dos’s 97. Campana Lee was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Campana Lee struck 2 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Gerard Campana Lee lost the serve 8 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Campana Lee put 60% of his first serves in, winning 57% (35/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (16/40) on the 2nd serve. Campana Lee broke Andre Saraiva Dos 9 times after converting 60% of his break points (9/15).
Campana Lee has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 52% of his matches (59-54). 25-26 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Campana Lee has a composed58-51 record in the last 4 years on clay.
Gerard’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Skopje Challenger and the Szczecin Challenger.
The Korean has an overall 25-26 win-loss record in 2024, 25-26 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Tristan Mccormick
25 - 29win/loss
678
495
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-31 | 9-11 | 17-17 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 4-7 | 14-8 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 13-5 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-6 | 14-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 698, Tristan got to the qualifications after defeating Adrian Maldonado 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Mccormick had a good straight sets win against Maldonado (6-1 6-0). During the match Mccormick scored 50 points vs Maldonado’s 15. Mccormick was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Mccormick fired 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tristan Mccormick was very efficient on serve to win 95% (18/19) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Maldonado 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Tristan’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Ithaca.
The American has a composed 25-28 win-loss record in 2024, 17-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Mccormick has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Campana Lee | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 13 |
| Pts | 101-97 | 50-15 |
| Total Points | 198 | 65 |
| Winners | 35 | 18 |
| %Winners | 35% | 36% |
Both Campana Lee and Mccormick played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Gerard Campana Lee dropped 1 set while Tristan Mccormick hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Campana Lee has played 1 set more than Mccormick (3 vs 2). Therefore, Campana Lee played 19 games more than Mccormick. Campana Lee scored 35 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Tristan scored 18 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Campana Lee | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 10 |
| 1st in | 61/101 | 19/36 |
| %1st in | 60% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 35/61 | 18/19 |
| %1st pts | 57% | 95% |
| 2nd pts | 16/40 | 11/17 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 65% |
Campana Lee recorded 2 aces . Mccormick bagged 10 aces . Campana Lee won 57% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Mccormick won 95% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Campana Lee | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 5 |
| Converted | 9/15 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 60% | 71% |
| Conceded | 14 | 0 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 43% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 0 |
The Korean broke his opponent 9 times with a 60% conversion rate. Campana Lee surrendered his serve 8 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Tristan was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Campana Lee | |||
| Q1 Andre Saraiva Dos | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 101-97 | 101-97 | |
| Total points | 198 | 198 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 61/101 | 61/101 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 35/61 | 35/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/40 | 16/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 9 | 9 | |
| Converted | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 6/14 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 8 | 8 | |
| Mccormick | |||
| Q1 Maldonado | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 50-15 | 50-15 | |
| Total points | 65 | 65 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | 18/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Andres AndradeAndrade (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Federico CoriaCoria (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Conner Huertas Del PinoHuertas Del Pino – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Arklon Huertas Del PinoHuertas Del Pino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Leonardo AboianAboian (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Ignacio MonzonMonzon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction