Raphael Collignon and Adrian Andreev will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Bratislava 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Raphael Collignon who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Raphael Collignon is the pick to win this match.
Raphael Collignon -> 1.31
Adrian Andreev -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Raphael Collignon vs. Adrian Andreev
There is no head to head record between Raphael Collignon and Adrian Andreev since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Raphael Collignon
63 - 21win/loss
121
121
LWWWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 72-23 | 5-3 | 46-8 | 21-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-22 | 14-4 | 38-12 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-20 | 11-11 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 167, Collignon got to the qualifications after defeating Jelle Sels 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Collignon had a good straight sets win against Sels (6-4 6-2). During the match, Collignon scored 62 points vs Sels’s 38. Collignon was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Collignon recorded 5 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Raphael Collignon was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (25/32) of his 1st serve and 92% (12/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Raphael broke Sels 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Collignon has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 66% of his matches (166-85). 11-10 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Collignon has an aggregate28-26 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Luedenscheid Challenger where he overcame Botic Van De Zandschulp in the final 3-6 6-4 6-3.
The Belgian has a composed 62-21 win-loss record in 2024, 11-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 2 Challenger
Adrian Andreev
37 - 32win/loss
217
183
WLLWLWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-34 | 7-4 | 26-19 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-29 | 7-7 | 16-16 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 49-29 | 7-7 | 29-15 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-22 | 6-7 | 20-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 10-2 | 12-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 209, Adrian got to the qualifications after defeating Norbert Gombos 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Gombos, The Bulgarian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Andreev scored 99 points vs Gombos’s 90. Andreev was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Andreev scored 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Adrian Andreev lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Andreev put 68% of his first serves in, winning 70% (46/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. Andreev broke Gombos 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Porto 2 Challenger where he overcame Carlos Taberner in the final 6-3 6-0.
Adrian has a composed 37-31 win-loss record in 2024, 5-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Collignon | Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 29 |
| Pts | 62-38 | 99-90 |
| Total Points | 100 | 189 |
| Winners | 25 | 46 |
| %Winners | 40% | 46% |
Both Collignon and Andreev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Adrian Andreev dropped 1 set while Raphael Collignon hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Collignon has played 1 set(s) less than Andreev (2 vs 3). Therefore, Collignon played 11 games less than Andreev. Raphael scored 25 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Andreev scored 46 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Collignon | Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 32/45 | 66/97 |
| %1st in | 71% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 46/66 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 12/13 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 92% | 55% |
Collignon bagged 5 aces . Andreev made 5 aces . Collignon won 78% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 92% of the points. On the other side, Andreev won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Collignon | Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/13 |
| % Converted | 75% | 31% |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 8 |
| % Saved | 0% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Raphael broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Raphael extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Andreev broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. The Bulgarian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Collignon | |||
| Q1 Sels |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-38 | 62-38 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/45 | 32/45 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 25/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/13 | 12/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 92% | 92% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Andreev | |||
| Q1 Gombos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 99-90 | 99-90 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 66/97 | 66/97 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 46/66 | 46/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLWWW
WLLWLWLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Zsombor PirosPiros (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Laslo DjereDjere (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Lukas KleinKlein (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
