Kyle Edmund and Strong Kirchheimer will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on COURT 9. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.44
Strong Kirchheimer -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kyle Edmund vs. Strong Kirchheimer
There is no head to head record between Kyle Edmund and Strong Kirchheimer since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Kyle Edmund
39 - 23win/loss
352
14
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 350, Edmund got to the qualifications after beating Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg 6-4 7-6(4).
In the qualifications, Kyle had a good straight sets win against Von Der Schulenburg (6-4 7-64). During the match, Edmund scored 86 points vs Von Der Schulenburg’s 74. Edmund was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Edmund recorded 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kyle Edmund was very efficient on serve to win 73% (33/45) of his 1st serve and 63% (20/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Von Der Schulenburg twice after converting 18% of his break points (2/11).
Edmund has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (248-170). 24-9 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Edmund has an overall 59-26 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Kyle’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
Kyle has a compiled 38-23 win-loss record in 2024, 24-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Kyle has never competed in this tournament before.
Strong Kirchheimer
18 - 27win/loss
618
375
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-30 | 14-17 | 2-4 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 610, the American got to the qualifications after beating Ryan Seggerman 7-6(6) 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kirchheimer had a good straight sets win against Seggerman (7-66 6-2). During the match Kirchheimer scored 77 points vs Seggerman’s 63. The American was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Kirchheimer blasted 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Strong Kirchheimer lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kirchheimer put 61% of his first serves in, winning 71% (29/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Seggerman 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Strong’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 San Diego.
The American has an aggregate 18-26 win-loss record in 2024, 4-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Edmund | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 21 |
| Pts | 86-74 | 77-63 |
| Total Points | 160 | 140 |
| Winners | 33 | 29 |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% |
Both Edmund and Kirchheimer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Edmund and Kirchheimer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Edmund played 2 games more than Kirchheimer. The Brit scored 33 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Kirchheimer bagged 29 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Edmund | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 45/77 | 41/67 |
| %1st in | 58% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 29/41 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 13/26 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 50% |
Edmund recorded 2 aces . Kirchheimer scored 2 aces . Edmund won 73% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Kirchheimer won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Edmund | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/11 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 18% | 40% |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 |
| Saved | 6 | 3 |
| % Saved | 86% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Brit broke his opponent twice with a 18% conversion rate. The Brit surrendered his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Strong broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Edmund | |||
| Q1 Von Der Schulenburg | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 86-74 | 86-74 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/77 | 45/77 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 20/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/11 | 2/11 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 18% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kirchheimer | |||
| Q1 Seggerman | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 77-63 | 77-63 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/67 | 41/67 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 13/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blaz RolaRola – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Chris RodeschRodesch (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Govind NandaNanda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Denis KudlaKudla (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Radu Mihai PapoeMihai Papoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction