Jie Cui and Julian Ocleppo will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Seoul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jie Cui who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jie Cui is the pick to win this match.
Jie Cui -> 1.5
Julian Ocleppo -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jie Cui vs. Julian Ocleppo
There is no head to head record between Jie Cui and Julian Ocleppo since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jie Cui
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-27 | 36-26 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-23 | 36-21 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 10-10 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 358, Jie reached the qualifications after defeating Tomohiro Masabayashi 7-6(4) 6-4.
In the qualifications, Cui had a good straight sets win against Masabayashi (7-64 6-4). During the match, Cui scored 69 points vs Masabayashi’s 58. Jie was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cui managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Jie Cui was very effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 72% (21/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Cui broke Masabayashi 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Cui has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (154-117). 36-24 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cui has a compiled136-100 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Jie’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat,M25 Anning and M25 Fuzhou.
The Chinese has an overall 41-25 win-loss record in 2024, 36-24 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Jie has never competed in this tournament before.
Julian Ocleppo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 5-6 | 2-1 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-18 | 3-2 | 32-15 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 15-6 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 897, the Italian got to the qualifications after defeating Alafia Ayeni 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Julian had a good straight sets win against Ayeni (6-4 6-4). During the match Ocleppo scored 63 points vs Ayeni’s 54. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Ocleppo scored 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Julian Ocleppo was very effective on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Julian broke Ayeni twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Ocleppo has a composed 4-5 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Cui | Ocleppo |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 23 | 20 |
Pts | 69-58 | 63-54 |
Total Points | 127 | 117 |
Winners | 24 | 27 |
%Winners | 35% | 43% |
Both Cui and Ocleppo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cui and Ocleppo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cui played 3 games more than Ocleppo. The Chinese scored 24 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Julian fired 27 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Cui | Ocleppo |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 4 |
Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
1st in | 31/60 | 35/55 |
%1st in | 52% | 64% |
1st pts | 24/31 | 27/35 |
%1st pts | 77% | 77% |
2nd pts | 21/29 | 14/20 |
%2nd pts | 72% | 70% |
Cui scored 5 aces . Ocleppo scored 4 aces . Cui won 77% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Ocleppo won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Cui | Ocleppo |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 2 |
Converted | 3/4 | 2/5 |
% Converted | 75% | 40% |
Conceded | 6 | 2 |
Saved | 4 | 2 |
% Saved | 67% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Cui broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Ocleppo broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Italian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Cui | |||
Q1 Masabayashi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 69-58 | 69-58 | |
Total points | 127 | 127 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 31/60 | 31/60 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 24/31 | 24/31 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 21/29 | 21/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Ocleppo | |||
Q1 Ayeni |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 63-54 | 63-54 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 35/55 | 35/55 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yan BaiBai – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Duckhee LeeLee (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Benoit PairePaire (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Hyeon ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Elias YmerYmer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jie CuiCui – Julian OcleppoOcleppo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Seongbin SimSim – Kaito UesugiUesugi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Sanhui ShinShin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (0-0) – H2H and prediction