Juncheng Shang and Zizou Bergs will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Rolex Paris Masters for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zizou Bergs who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zizou Bergs is the pick to win this match.
Zizou Bergs -> 1.86
Juncheng Shang -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juncheng Shang vs. Zizou Bergs
This will be the 2nd time that Juncheng Shang and Zizou Bergs clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Bergs (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Bergs won 6-4 7-6(5) in the qualifications in Rome back in May 2024.
Juncheng Shang
41 - 22win/loss
51
47
LLWWLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-24 | 25-10 | 8-7 | 2-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 21-14 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-24 | 17-8 | 15-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-5 | 6-3 | 12-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 47 (career-high), Shang reached the qualifications after beating James Duckworth 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the qualifications against Duckworth, The Chinese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 7-65 6-4). During the match, Shang scored 115 points vs Duckworth’s 108. Juncheng was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Shang scored 12 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Juncheng Shang was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (48/60) of his 1st serve and 63% (31/49) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Chinese broke Duckworth twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Shang has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 64% of his matches (130-74). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Shang has an aggregate8-8 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title in Chengdu where he overcame Lorenzo Musetti in the final 7-6(4) 6-1.
Juncheng has a compiled 41-22 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Paris
Juncheng has never competed in this tournament before.
Zizou Bergs
44 - 26win/loss
61
61
LWWLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-29 | 9-9 | 17-7 | 15-9 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-27 | 8-7 | 16-7 | 9-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 7-5 | 7-7 | 17-16 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-21 | 2-5 | 15-10 | 21-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-9 | 14-6 | 1-2 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 65 (career-high), Bergs got to the qualifications after defeating Harold Mayot 7-6(4) 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Mayot (7-64 6-4). During the match Bergs scored 82 points vs Mayot’s 72. Zizou was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Bergs made 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Zizou Bergs was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 65% (22/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Zizou broke Mayot 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Tallahassee Challenger where he overcame Mitchell Krueger in the final 6-4 7-6(9).
The Belgian has a compiled 44-26 win-loss record in 2024, 12-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Paris
The Belgian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shang | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 23 |
| Pts | 115-108 | 82-72 |
| Total Points | 223 | 154 |
| Winners | 48 | 24 |
| %Winners | 42% | 29% |
Both Shang and Bergs played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Juncheng Shang dropped 1 set while Zizou Bergs hasn’t dropped a set so far. Shang has played 1 set more than Bergs (3 vs 2). Therefore, Shang played 13 games more than Bergs. The Chinese scored 48 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Bergs blasted 24 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shang | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 9 |
| 1st in | 60/109 | 33/67 |
| %1st in | 55% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 48/60 | 24/33 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 31/49 | 22/34 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 65% |
Shang scored 12 aces . Bergs scored 9 aces . Shang won 80% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Bergs won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shang | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 25% | 25% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 75% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Chinese broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Zizou broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Zizou conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Shang | |||
| Q1 Duckworth |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-72 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
| pts | 115-108 | 115-108 | |
| Total points | 223 | 223 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 60/109 | 60/109 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 48/60 | 48/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 31/49 | 31/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Bergs | |||
| Q1 Mayot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 82-72 | 82-72 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 33/67 | 33/67 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLWLWW
LWWLWLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (6-3) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Richard GasquetGasquet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
