Benjamin Hassan and Jakub Paul will face off in the quarter of the Brest Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 2:30 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Benjamin Hassan who should win in 3 sets.
Benjamin Hassan -> 1.6
Jakub Paul -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Benjamin Hassan vs. Jakub Paul
There is no head to head record between Benjamin Hassan and Jakub Paul since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Benjamin Hassan
31 - 33win/loss
246
143
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-37 | 3-10 | 20-16 | 9-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, Benjamin reached the quarter after defeating Tristan Lamasine 6-4 6-2, Adrian Andreev 7-5 4-6 6-4 and Martin Landaluce 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Benjamin defeated Landaluce (6-2 6-72 6-2). During the match, Hassan scored 119 points vs Landaluce’s 103. Benjamin was quite aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hassan scored 12 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Benjamin Hassan was quite effective on serve to win 71% (51/72) of his 1st serve and 51% (22/43) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Benjamin broke Landaluce 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Benjamin started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 2 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Hassan has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (271-188). 6-5 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Hassan has a compiled45-38 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
The Lebanese’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Girona Challenger and the Bonn Challenger.
Benjamin has a composed 30-33 win-loss record in 2024, 6-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Benjamin has never competed in this tournament before.
Jakub Paul
39 - 24win/loss
378
378
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 40-25 | 11-7 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 9-10 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 413 (career-high), the Swiss reached the quarter after defeating Clement Tabur 6-4 3-6 7-6(5), Adrian Andreev 2-6 6-3 6-4, Manuel Guinard 6-3 6-4 and Hugo Grenier 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Jakub had a good straight sets win against Grenier (6-4 6-2). During the match Paul scored 72 points vs Grenier’s 59. Jakub was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Paul struck 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jakub Paul conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Paul put 75% of his first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the 2nd serve. Jakub broke Grenier 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jakub started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
The Swiss’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Sarajevo and M25 Sion.
Jakub has a composed 39-23 win-loss record in 2024, 11-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Hassan | Paul |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 4 |
Tot Set | 8 | 10 |
Tot Games | 79 | 96 |
Pts | 285-249 | 335-308 |
Total Points | 534 | 643 |
Winners | 117 | 146 |
%Winners | 41% | 44% |
Hassan played 3 matches while Paul competed in 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Benjamin Hassan surrendered 2 sets, while Jakub Paul lost 2 sets. Hassan has played 2 set(s) less than Paul (8 vs 10). Therefore, Hassan played 17 games less than Paul. Benjamin scored 117 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Paul managed to score 146 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Hassan | Paul |
---|---|---|
Aces | 23 | 12 |
Avg per match | 7.7 | 3 |
1st in | 174/285 | 212/317 |
%1st in | 61% | 67% |
1st pts | 117/174 | 146/212 |
%1st pts | 67% | 69% |
2nd pts | 63/111 | 49/105 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 47% |
Hassan blasted 23 aces (7.7 per match). Paul managed to score 12 aces (3 per match). Hassan won 67% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Paul won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Hassan | Paul |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 17 |
Converted | 12/27 | 17/32 |
% Converted | 44% | 53% |
Conceded | 30 | 33 |
Saved | 26 | 22 |
% Saved | 87% | 67% |
Times Broken | 4 | 11 |
Hassan broke his opponents 12 times with a 44% conversion rate. Hassan lost his serve 4 times and he saved 87% of the break points that he conceded. Paul broke his opponents 17 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Hassan | ||||||
Q1 Lamasine | Q3 Hans | R1 Andreev | R2 Landaluce | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | 6-2 6-72 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 32 | 29 | 97 | |
pts | 60-43 | – | 106-103 | 119-103 | 285-249 | |
Total points | 103 | 0 | 209 | 222 | 534 | |
Winners | 25 | 41 | 51 | 117 | ||
%Winners | 42% | 0% | 39% | 43% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 1 | 0 | 10 | 12 | 23 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | ||
1st in | 31/52 | / | 71/118 | 72/115 | 174/285 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 0% | 60% | 63% | 61% | |
1st pts | 25/31 | / | 41/71 | 51/72 | 117/174 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 0% | 58% | 71% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | / | 28/47 | 22/43 | 63/111 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 0% | 60% | 51% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | ||
Converted | 3/3 | / | 5/11 | 4/13 | 12/27 | |
Converted % | 100% | 0% | 45% | 31% | 44% | |
Conceded | 2 | 17 | 11 | 30 | ||
Saved | 2/2 | 0/ | 13/17 | 11/11 | 26 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 76% | 100% | 69% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Paul | ||||||
Q1 Tabur | Q3 Andreev | R1 Guinard | R2 Grenier | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 3-6 7-65 | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 27 | 19 | 18 | 96 | |
pts | 105-104 | 91-88 | 67-57 | 72-59 | 335-308 | |
Total points | 209 | 179 | 124 | 131 | 643 | |
Winners | 43 | 47 | 26 | 30 | 146 | |
%Winners | 41% | 52% | 39% | 42% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
1st in | 70/107 | 65/96 | 34/57 | 43/57 | 212/317 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 68% | 60% | 75% | 67% | |
1st pts | 43/70 | 47/65 | 26/34 | 30/43 | 146/212 | |
% 1st pts | 61% | 72% | 76% | 70% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 17/37 | 11/31 | 11/23 | 10/14 | 49/105 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 35% | 48% | 71% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 17 | |
Converted | 6/6 | 4/5 | 4/11 | 3/10 | 17/32 | |
Converted % | 100% | 80% | 36% | 30% | 53% | |
Conceded | 14 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 33 | |
Saved | 8/14 | 9/13 | 3/4 | 2/2 | 22 | |
Saved % | 57% | 69% | 75% | 100% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – (1-1) – H2H and prediction