Stefanos Tsitsipas and Botic Van De Zandschulp will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Swiss Indoors Basel for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stefanos Tsitsipas who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Stefanos Tsitsipas is the pick to win this match.
Stefanos Tsitsipas -> 1.32
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Stefanos Tsitsipas vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 2nd time that Stefanos Tsitsipas and Botic Van De Zandschulp clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Tsitsipas (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Tsitsipas won 7-5 6-3 in the 2nd round in Antwerp back in 2023.
Highlights Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Botic Van De Zandschulp – Antwerp 19-October-2023
Stefanos Tsitsipas
41 - 20win/loss
11
3
LWWWLWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-22 | 13-11 | 22-6 | 8-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-24 | 19-9 | 17-5 | 11-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-24 | 18-8 | 17-4 | 18-9 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 55-19 | 26-8 | 23-5 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 29-14 | 11-6 | 11-3 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 11, Tsitsipas got to the 2nd round after beating Francisco Cerundolo 6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, The Greek defeated Cerundolo (6-3 6-73 7-64). During the match, Tsitsipas scored 120 points vs Cerundolo’s 111. The Greek was exceptionally aggressive to blast 56 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tsitsipas made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Stefanos Tsitsipas lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Tsitsipas put 61% of his first serves in, winning 77% (56/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (22/47) on the 2nd serve. Stefanos broke Cerundolo 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Tsitsipas has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 69% of his matches (485-223). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tsitsipas has a compiled 92-50 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was winning the title in Carlo where he overcame Casper Ruud in the final 6-1 6-4.
Tsitsipas has a compiled 41-20 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Basel
Botic Van De Zandschulp
31 - 30win/loss
80
22
WWLLWWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-32 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 67, Botic got to the 2nd round after defeating Thiago Moura Monteiro 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4, David Goffin 6-2 6-4 and Alexander Bublik 3-6 6-4 4-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Bublik, Van De Zandschulp had a free pass after Bublik retired on a 3-6 6-4 4-0 . scoreline.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger and the Luedenscheid Challenger.
The Dutch has an overall 31-30 win-loss record in 2024, 5-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Basel
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tsitsipas | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 74 |
| Pts | 120-111 | 271-242 |
| Total Points | 231 | 513 |
| Winners | 56 | 123 |
| %Winners | 47% | 45% |
Tsitsipas played 1 match while Van De Zandschulp competed in 3 matches. Van De Zandschulp started his run from the qualifications while Tsitsipas had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Stefanos Tsitsipas dropped 1 set, while Botic Van De Zandschulp surrendered 2 sets. Tsitsipas has played 6 set(s) less than Van De Zandschulp (3 vs 9). Therefore, Tsitsipas played 39 games less than Van De Zandschulp. The Greek scored 56 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch scored 123 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tsitsipas | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6.7 |
| 1st in | 73/120 | 172/261 |
| %1st in | 61% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 56/73 | 123/172 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 22/47 | 48/89 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 54% |
Tsitsipas bagged 6 aces . Van De Zandschulp made 20 aces (6.7 per match). Tsitsipas won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tsitsipas | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 10 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 10/26 |
| % Converted | 25% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 17 |
| Saved | 5 | 14 |
| % Saved | 71% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Tsitsipas broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Tsitsipas dropped his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Botic broke his opponents 10 times with a 38% conversion rate. Botic conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tsitsipas | |||
| R1 Cerundolo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-73 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 120-111 | 120-111 | |
| Total points | 231 | 231 | |
| Winners | 56 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 73/120 | 73/120 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 56/73 | 56/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/47 | 22/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||||
| Q1 Moura Monteiro |
Q3 Goffin |
R1 Bublik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | 3-6 6-4 4-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 18 | 23 | 74 | |
| pts | 108-95 | 75-68 | 88-79 | 271-242 | |
| Total points | 203 | 143 | 167 | 513 | |
| Winners | 48 | 33 | 42 | 123 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | 48% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 5 | 5 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 65/95 | 50/85 | 57/81 | 172/261 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 59% | 70% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 48/65 | 33/50 | 42/57 | 123/172 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 66% | 74% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/30 | 17/35 | 10/24 | 48/89 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 49% | 42% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 4/8 | 3/8 | 10/26 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 50% | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 | 4 | 17 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 9/10 | 3/4 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 90% | 75% | 232% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWL
WWLLWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Basel
- David GoffinGoffin – Ugo HumbertHumbert (3-6 6-1 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
