Jakub Mensik and Miomir Kecmanovic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Erste Bank Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on #GLAUBANDICH. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Mensik who should win in 3 sets.
Jakub Mensik -> 1.57
Miomir Kecmanovic -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jakub Mensik vs. Miomir Kecmanovic
There is no head to head record between Jakub Mensik and Miomir Kecmanovic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jakub Mensik
39 - 22win/loss
48
48
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-24 | 26-12 | 6-4 | 7-3 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-23 | 10-6 | 17-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-16 | 18-4 | 17-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 51 (career-high), Mensik reached the 2nd round after beating Alexander Ritschard 6-3 6-4, Alexandre Muller 6-3 6-2 and Alexei Popyrin 7-6(3) 6-2.
In the 1st round, Jakub had a good straight sets win against Popyrin (7-63 6-2). During the match, Mensik scored 82 points vs Popyrin’s 64. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mensik struck 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jakub Mensik was quite effective on serve to win 83% (29/35) of his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mensik broke Popyrin twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Mensik has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 64% of his matches (114-65). 5-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mensik has an overall15-8 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Mensik’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Canberra Challenger and Doha.
The Czech has a compiled 39-22 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Vienna
The Czech has never competed in this tournament before.
Miomir Kecmanovic
24 - 27win/loss
54
27
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 26-31 | 10-15 | 6-7 | 6-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 28-31 | 11-13 | 9-9 | 6-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-26 | 21-11 | 15-8 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 17-27 | 6-11 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 18-13 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 58, Kecmanovic got to the 2nd round after beating Mariano Navone 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Kecmanovic had a good straight sets win against Navone (6-2 6-4). During the match Kecmanovic scored 62 points vs Navone’s 45. Miomir was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Kecmanovic struck 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Miomir Kecmanovic was exceptionally effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Miomir broke Navone 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Miomir has a compiled 24-27 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mensik | Kecmanovic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 6 | 2 |
Tot Games | 57 | 18 |
Pts | 211-163 | 62-45 |
Total Points | 374 | 107 |
Winners | 85 | 27 |
%Winners | 40% | 44% |
Mensik played 3 matches while Kecmanovic competed in 1 match. Mensik started his run from the qualifications while Kecmanovic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Mensik has played 4 sets more than Kecmanovic (6 vs 2). Therefore, Mensik played 39 games more than Kecmanovic. Mensik scored 85 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Miomir bagged 27 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mensik | Kecmanovic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 22 | 8 |
Avg per match | 7.3 | 8 |
1st in | 112/181 | 32/48 |
%1st in | 62% | 67% |
1st pts | 85/112 | 27/32 |
%1st pts | 76% | 84% |
2nd pts | 41/69 | 10/16 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 63% |
Mensik recorded 22 aces (7.3 per match). Kecmanovic bagged 8 aces . Mensik won 76% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Kecmanovic won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mensik | Kecmanovic |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 3 |
Converted | 9/16 | 3/7 |
% Converted | 56% | 43% |
Conceded | 12 | 1 |
Saved | 10 | 1 |
% Saved | 83% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Mensik broke his opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. Mensik surrendered his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Miomir broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Kecmanovic was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Mensik | |||||
Q1 Ritschard | Q3 Muller | R1 Popyrin | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-63 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 21 | 57 | |
pts | 67-54 | 62-45 | 82-64 | 211-163 | |
Total points | 121 | 107 | 146 | 374 | |
Winners | 25 | 31 | 29 | 85 | |
%Winners | 37% | 50% | 35% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 8 | 9 | 5 | 22 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
1st in | 41/63 | 36/55 | 35/63 | 112/181 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | 56% | 62% | |
1st pts | 25/41 | 31/36 | 29/35 | 85/112 | |
% 1st pts | 61% | 86% | 83% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 15/22 | 9/19 | 17/28 | 41/69 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 47% | 61% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 3/4 | 2/6 | 9/16 | |
Converted % | 67% | 75% | 33% | 56% | |
Conceded | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 1/1 | 5/5 | 10 | |
Saved % | 67% | 100% | 100% | 89% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Kecmanovic | |||||
R1 Navone | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |||
pts | 62-45 | 62-45 | |||
Total points | 107 | 107 | |||
Winners | 27 | 27 | |||
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |||
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |||
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |||
1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |||
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |||
2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |||
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 3 | |||
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |||
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |||
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |||
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |||
Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Tennis Scores in Vienna
- Tomas MachacMachac – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Tommy PaulPaul (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (2-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Marcos GironGiron – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Quentin HalysHalys (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Rohan Bopanna/Matthew EbdenBopanna/Matthew Ebden – Robin Haase/Alexander ZverevHaase/Alexander Zverev (2-6 7-5 10-5) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Mariano NavoneNavone (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Kei NishikoriNishikori (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Dominic ThiemThiem (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Luciano Darderi/Mariano NavoneDarderi/Mariano Navone – Marcelo Arevalo/Mate PavicArevalo/Mate Pavic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Sander Gille/Joran VliegenGille/Joran Vliegen (6-2 4-6 11-9) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Neal Skupski/Michael VenusSkupski/Michael Venus – Rafael Matos/Marcelo MeloMatos/Marcelo Melo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (7-6(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Tommy PaulPaul (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Marcos GironGiron (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-1) – H2H and prediction