Govind Nanda and Ozan Baris will square off in the 2nd round of the Sioux Falls Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Govind Nanda who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Govind Nanda is the pick to win this match.
Govind Nanda -> 1.38
Ozan Baris -> 2.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Govind Nanda vs. Ozan Baris
There is no head to head record between Govind Nanda and Ozan Baris since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Govind Nanda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-16 | 17-10 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 5-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 21-10 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 480, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Nishesh Basavareddy 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Govind had a good straight sets win against Basavareddy (6-4 6-4). During the match, Nanda scored 67 points vs Basavareddy’s 61. Nanda was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nanda recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Govind Nanda lost the serve once. Furthermore, Nanda put 56% of his first serves in, winning 59% (22/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 72% (21/29) on the 2nd serve. Govind broke Basavareddy 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Nanda has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (134-91). 7-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Nanda has an aggregate7-10 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Govind’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Lakewood and the Calgary Challenger.
Nanda has a composed 24-12 win-loss record in 2024, 7-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sioux Falls Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Ozan Baris
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-14 | 8-9 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-15 | 13-11 | 2-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-11 | 0-1 | 9-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 709, Baris reached the 2nd round after defeating Alastair Gray 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Gray, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Baris scored 84 points vs Gray’s 76. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Baris scored 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Ozan Baris was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (35/44) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Gray 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Ozan has an overall 11-11 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nanda | Baris |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 28 |
| Pts | 67-61 | 84-76 |
| Total Points | 128 | 160 |
| Winners | 22 | 35 |
| %Winners | 33% | 42% |
Both Nanda and Baris played 1 match. At the moment, Ozan Baris conceded 1 set while Govind Nanda hasn’t lost a set so far. Nanda has played 1 set(s) less than Baris (2 vs 3). Therefore, Nanda played 8 games less than Baris. Nanda scored 22 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Ozan made 35 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nanda | Baris |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 37/66 | 44/71 |
| %1st in | 56% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 22/37 | 35/44 |
| %1st pts | 59% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 21/29 | 16/27 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 59% |
Nanda struck 2 aces . Baris scored 5 aces . Nanda won 59% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Baris won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nanda | Baris |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Nanda broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Ozan conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nanda | |||
| R1 Basavareddy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-61 | 67-61 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/66 | 37/66 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 22/37 | 22/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/29 | 21/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Baris | |||
| R1 Gray |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 84-76 | 84-76 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 44/71 | 44/71 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 35/44 | 35/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWLWW
LWLLWWLWLW Tennis Scores in Sioux Falls Challenger
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Andres MartinMartin (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Cooper WoestendickWoestendick (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Matthew ForbesForbes (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Omni KumarKumar (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-77 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Martin DammDamm (5-7 7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-3 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-63 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ozan BarisBaris – Alastair GrayGray (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-7(7) 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
