Xiyu Wang and Sijia Wei will play each other in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 7:00 pm on Centre Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Xiyu Wang who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Xiyu Wang is the pick to win this match.
Xiyu Wang -> 1.27
Sijia Wei -> 3.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Xiyu Wang vs. Sijia Wei
This will be the 2nd time that Xiyu Wang and Sijia Wei square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Wang (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Wang won 6-2 6-3 in the qualifications in Guangzhou back in 2019.
Xiyu Wang
25 - 27win/loss
98
49
LWLWLWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-30 | 18-19 | 9-8 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 17-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-25 | 15-10 | 23-11 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-19 | 8-7 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 11-7 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, Xiyu reached the 2nd round after beating Arantxa Rus 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Xiyu had a good straight sets win against Rus (6-2 6-4). During the match, Wang scored 68 points vs Rus’s 50. Wang was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wang made 7 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Xiyu Wang was pretty effective on serve to win 76% (26/34) of her 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Wang broke Rus 4 times after converting 67% of her break points (4/6).
Wang has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 58% of her matches (211-155). 16-17 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Wang has an overall128-96 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Wang’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Austin.
Xiyu has a composed 25-27 win-loss record in 2024, 16-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Guangzhou
Sijia Wei
38 - 18win/loss
134
130
LWWWWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-22 | 41-18 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-22 | 29-18 | 6-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-28 | 78-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 135 (career-high), Sijia reached the 2nd round after defeating Rebecca Sramkova 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Wei had a good straight sets win against Sramkova (6-1 6-4). During the match Wei scored 65 points vs Sramkova’s 47. Wei was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Wei struck 2 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Sijia Wei lost the serve once and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Wei put 46% of her first serves in, winning 69% (18/26) of the points behind her 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the 2nd serve. Sijia broke Sramkova 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W50 Kashiwa where she overcame Ya-Hsuan Lee in the final 6-1 7-5 and the W35 Tianjin where she overcame Hina Inoue in the final 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 and the W75 Lexington where she defeated Mananchaya Sawangkaew in the final 7-5 6-4.
Sijia has a compiled 38-18 win-loss record in 2024, 36-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Guangzhou
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2019 and 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Wei |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 68-50 | 65-47 |
| Total Points | 118 | 112 |
| Winners | 26 | 18 |
| %Winners | 38% | 28% |
Both Wang and Wei played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Wang and Wei have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Wang played 1 game more than Wei. Wang scored 26 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Wei fired 18 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Wei |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 34/62 | 26/56 |
| %1st in | 55% | 46% |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 18/26 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 19/30 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 63% |
Wang bagged 7 aces . Wei scored 2 aces . Wang won 76% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Wei won 69% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Wei |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 67% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 75% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Wang broke her opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Wang lost her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded. Sijia broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve once and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||
| R1 Rus |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-50 | 68-50 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 34/62 | 34/62 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Wei | |||
| R1 Sramkova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 65-47 | 65-47 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 26/56 | 26/56 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 18/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWLWL
LWWWWLWLWL Tennis Scores in Guangzhou
- Maxime TchoutakianTchoutakian – Nicholas HortonHorton (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Frederico GilGil – Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo (6-0 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – Antonio Cembellin PrietoCembellin Prieto (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Francisco CabralCabral (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pablo Vivero GonzalezVivero Gonzalez – Alexandre Castanho RibeiroCastanho Ribeiro (6-3 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Alycia ParksParks (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Shuai ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Mananchaya SawangkaewSawangkaew (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Diane ParryParry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – Xiyu WangWang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
