Tristan Schoolkate and Moerani Bouzige will square off in the 2nd round of the Playford Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:30 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.087
Moerani Bouzige -> 6.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Moerani Bouzige
This will be the 2nd time that Tristan Schoolkate and Moerani Bouzige play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Schoolkate (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Schoolkate won 6-2 6-3 in the quarter in M25 Darwin back in 2022.
Tristan Schoolkate
40 - 29win/loss
168
167
LLLWWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 176, Schoolkate got to the 2nd round after defeating Jake Delaney 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Tristan had a good straight sets win against Delaney (6-4 6-3). During the match, Schoolkate scored 76 points vs Delaney’s 59. Schoolkate was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate managed to score 17 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate was quite efficient on serve to win 86% (32/37) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Delaney twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Schoolkate has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (166-117). 34-21 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has an overall106-76 record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Guangzhou Challenger where he defeated Adam Walton in the final 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Schoolkate has an aggregate 40-29 win-loss record in 2024, 34-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Playford Challenger
Moerani Bouzige
31 - 27win/loss
597
553
WWWWWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-33 | 42-32 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-36 | 33-27 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-19 | 13-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-4 | 21-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 605, Bouzige got to the 2nd round after defeating Jacob Bradshaw 4-6 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round against Bradshaw, Bouzige recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-3). During the match Bouzige scored 103 points vs Bradshaw’s 93. Bouzige was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Bouzige fired 14 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Moerani Bouzige lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Bouzige put 68% of his first serves in, winning 76% (50/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Bradshaw 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
The Australian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Monastir.
Bouzige has a compiled 31-27 win-loss record in 2024, 31-26 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Playford Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Bouzige |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 31 |
| Pts | 76-59 | 103-93 |
| Total Points | 135 | 196 |
| Winners | 32 | 50 |
| %Winners | 42% | 49% |
Both Schoolkate and Bouzige played 1 match. At the moment, Moerani Bouzige lost 1 set while Tristan Schoolkate hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Schoolkate has played 1 set(s) less than Bouzige (2 vs 3). Therefore, Schoolkate played 12 games less than Bouzige. Schoolkate scored 32 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Bouzige managed to score 50 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Bouzige |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 17 | 14 |
| 1st in | 37/65 | 66/97 |
| %1st in | 57% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 50/66 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/31 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 48% |
Schoolkate scored 17 aces . Bouzige made 14 aces . Schoolkate won 86% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Bouzige won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Bouzige |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 25% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 7 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Tristan broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Schoolkate pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 7 break points. Moerani broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | |||
| R1 Delaney |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 76-59 | 76-59 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 37/65 | 37/65 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 32/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Bouzige | |||
| R1 Bradshaw |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 103-93 | 103-93 | |
| Total points | 196 | 196 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 66/97 | 66/97 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 50/66 | 50/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLWWL
WWWWWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Playford Challenger
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Emile HuddHudd (7-64 7-62) – See score progression
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Colin SinclairSinclair (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Tibo ColsonColson (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Edward WinterWinter (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Hikaru ShiraishiShiraishi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Blake MottMott (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Takuya KumasakaKumasaka (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda – Ajeet RaiRai (3-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Jacob BradshawBradshaw (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Blake EllisEllis (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Jake DelaneyDelaney (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Emile HuddHudd (7-6(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Takuya KumasakaKumasaka (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Colin SinclairSinclair (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Edward WinterWinter (7-5 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda – Ajeet RaiRai (3-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Tibo ColsonColson (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Blake MottMott (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Hikaru ShiraishiShiraishi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Shintaro ImaiImai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Thomas FancuttFancutt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Dane SweenySweeny (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
