Roberto Cid Subervi and Keegan Smith will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Sioux Falls Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:00 pm on STADIUM 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roberto Cid Subervi who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Roberto Cid Subervi is the pick to win this match.
Roberto Cid Subervi -> 1.4
Keegan Smith -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roberto Cid Subervi vs. Keegan Smith
This will be the 2nd time that Roberto Cid Subervi and Keegan Smith play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Cid (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Cid won 6-4 6-2 in the qualifications in the San Luis Potosi Challenger back in March 2024.
Roberto Cid Subervi
36 - 20win/loss
426
211
WWWWLWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-20 | 15-5 | 23-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-18 | 22-9 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-8 | 14-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-30 | 6-12 | 4-15 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 0-3 | 6-8 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 426, the Dominican got to the qualifications after beating Patrick Brady 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Cid had a good straight sets win against Brady (6-3 6-1). During the match, Cid scored 58 points vs Brady’s 41. Cid was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cid recorded 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Roberto Cid Subervi was quite effective on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Cid broke Brady 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Cid has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (254-177). 1-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Cid has a compiled 12-17 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Cid’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M15 Pirot.
Cid has an overall 36-19 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sioux Falls Challenger
The Dominican has never competed in this tournament before.
Keegan Smith
31 - 19win/loss
544
339
LWLWLLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-23 | 30-18 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-26 | 31-20 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-24 | 26-14 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-5 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 563, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Kelsey Stevenson 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Stevenson (6-2 6-4). During the match Smith scored 62 points vs Stevenson’s 37. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Smith fired 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Keegan Smith was extremely efficient on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Smith broke Stevenson 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Smith’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Lakewood and the Jinan Challenger.
Smith has an overall 30-19 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cid | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 |
| Pts | 58-41 | 62-37 |
| Total Points | 99 | 99 |
| Winners | 22 | 27 |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both Cid and Smith played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cid and Smith have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cid played 2 games less than Smith. Roberto scored 22 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Keegan bagged 27 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cid | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 8 |
| 1st in | 29/46 | 32/43 |
| %1st in | 63% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 22/29 | 27/32 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 7/11 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 64% |
Cid recorded 7 aces . Smith struck 8 aces . Cid won 76% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Smith won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cid | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 44% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Dominican broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Roberto pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Keegan broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Keegan conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cid | |||
| Q1 Brady |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-41 | 58-41 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/46 | 29/46 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Smith | |||
| Q1 Stevenson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-37 | 62-37 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWLLWWW
LWLWLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto CidCid – Keegan SmithSmith (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin BorisioukBorisiouk – Siphosothando MontsiMontsi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
