Borna Gojo and Strong Kirchheimer will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Sioux Falls Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:00 pm on STADIUM 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 2 sets.
Borna Gojo -> 1.069
Strong Kirchheimer -> 7.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Borna Gojo vs. Strong Kirchheimer
There is no head to head record between Borna Gojo and Strong Kirchheimer since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Borna Gojo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 23-14 | 11-6 | 10-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, Borna got to the qualifications after beating Rudy Quan 4-6 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications against Quan, Gojo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-1). During the match, Gojo scored 83 points vs Quan’s 55. Gojo was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gojo managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Borna Gojo was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (27/37) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Borna broke Quan 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Gojo has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (231-165). 3-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gojo has an aggregate45-36 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Borna has a composed 4-8 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sioux Falls Challenger
Borna has never competed in this tournament before.
Strong Kirchheimer
17 - 26win/loss
618
375
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-30 | 14-17 | 2-4 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 614, Strong got to the qualifications after defeating Kaylan Bigun 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, Kirchheimer had a good straight sets win against Bigun (6-1 6-1). During the match Kirchheimer scored 51 points vs Bigun’s 22. Strong was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Kirchheimer blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Strong Kirchheimer was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (19/24) of his 1st serve and 69% (9/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Strong was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Bigun 5 times.
Kirchheimer’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 San Diego.
Strong has an aggregate 17-25 win-loss record in 2024, 3-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gojo | Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 24 | 14 |
Pts | 83-55 | 51-22 |
Total Points | 138 | 73 |
Winners | 27 | 19 |
%Winners | 33% | 37% |
Both Gojo and Kirchheimer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Borna Gojo lost 1 set while Strong Kirchheimer hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gojo has played 1 set more than Kirchheimer (3 vs 2). Therefore, Gojo played 10 games more than Kirchheimer. The Croatian scored 27 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 19 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gojo | Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 7 |
Avg per match | 6 | 7 |
1st in | 37/60 | 24/37 |
%1st in | 62% | 65% |
1st pts | 27/37 | 19/24 |
%1st pts | 73% | 79% |
2nd pts | 15/23 | 9/13 |
%2nd pts | 65% | 69% |
Gojo managed to score 6 aces . Kirchheimer bagged 7 aces . Gojo won 73% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Kirchheimer won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gojo | Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 5 |
Converted | 6/15 | 5/5 |
% Converted | 40% | 100% |
Conceded | 2 | 0 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Borna broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Borna lost his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Strong broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Gojo | |||
Q1 Quan | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
pts | 83-55 | 83-55 | |
Total points | 138 | 138 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 37/60 | 37/60 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kirchheimer | |||
Q1 Bigun | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 51-22 | 51-22 | |
Total points | 73 | 73 | |
Winners | 19 | 19 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 19/24 | 19/24 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 9/13 | 9/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto CidCid – Keegan SmithSmith (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin BorisioukBorisiouk – Siphosothando MontsiMontsi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction