Alycia Parks and Petra Martic will face off in the qualifications of the Guangzhou Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:00 pm on Court 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Petra Martic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Petra Martic is the pick to win this match.
Petra Martic -> 1.68
Alycia Parks -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alycia Parks vs. Petra Martic
This will be the 2nd time that Alycia Parks and Petra Martic square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Parks (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Parks won 2-6 7-6(3) 6-2 in the 2nd round in Lyon back in 2023.
Highlights Alycia Parks vs Petra Martic – Lyon 01-February-2023
Alycia Parks
23 - 25win/loss
82
40
WWWWWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-31 | 14-18 | 2-7 | 12-4 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-28 | 7-13 | 6-9 | 8-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-30 | 11-15 | 7-9 | 14-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-27 | 10-13 | 15-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-7 | 9-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 115, Parks got to the qualifications after defeating Kathinka Von Deichmann 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
In the qualifications against Von Deichmann, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-3). During the match, Parks scored 107 points vs Von Deichmann’s 100. Parks was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Parks blasted 11 aces and she was not very solid on her 2nd serve to score 16 double faults. Alycia Parks lost the serve 5 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Parks put 57% of her first serves in, winning 71% (41/58) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (18/44) on the 2nd serve. Alycia broke Von Deichmann 4 times after converting 33% of her break points (4/12).
Parks has won exactly 50% of her matches (163-166) in the last 7 years. 13-15 on hard in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Parks has an aggregate80-83 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Her best result of the season was conquering the title the Gaiba where she overcame Bernarda Pera in the final 6-3 6-1 and the Warsaw where she overcame Maya Joint in the final 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Parks has an aggregate 23-25 win-loss record in 2024, 13-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Guangzhou
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Petra Martic
17 - 21win/loss
122
14
LLLWWLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-24 | 9-10 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-22 | 8-13 | 6-4 | 5-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-21 | 11-10 | 18-6 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-21 | 7-12 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 122, Martic got to the qualifications after defeating Jiaqi Wang 6-2 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Croatian defeated Wang (6-2 3-6 6-4). During the match Martic scored 87 points vs Wang’s 76. The Croatian was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Martic recorded 4 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Petra Martic lost the serve 4 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Martic put 64% of her first serves in, winning 74% (35/47) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (10/27) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Wang 6 times after converting 50% of her break points (6/12).
Petra’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Makarska.
Petra has an aggregate 17-21 win-loss record in 2024, 8-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Parks | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 27 |
| Pts | 107-100 | 87-76 |
| Total Points | 207 | 163 |
| Winners | 41 | 35 |
| %Winners | 38% | 40% |
Both Parks and Martic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Alycia Parks surrendered 1 set, while Petra Martic surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Parks and Martic have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Parks played 4 games more than Martic. Parks scored 41 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Petra struck 35 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Parks | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 4 |
| 1st in | 58/102 | 47/74 |
| %1st in | 57% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 35/47 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 18/44 | 10/27 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 37% |
Parks struck 11 aces . Martic fired 4 aces . Parks won 71% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Martic won 74% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Parks | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 33% | 50% |
| Conceded | 13 | 6 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 62% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Alycia broke her opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The American lost her serve 5 times and she saved 62% of the break points that she conceded. Petra broke her opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Petra conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded.
| Parks | |||
| Q1 Von Deichmann |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 107-100 | 107-100 | |
| Total points | 207 | 207 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 16 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 58/102 | 58/102 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 41/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/44 | 18/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 8/13 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 62% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Martic | |||
| Q1 Wang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 87-76 | 87-76 | |
| Total points | 163 | 163 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 47/74 | 47/74 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/27 | 10/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWWL
LLLWWLWWLL Tennis Scores in Guangzhou
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – Stefan PetrovicPetrovic (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Antonio Muniz HidalgoMuniz Hidalgo – Emilio Andrea SegarelliAndrea Segarelli (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ben JonesJones – Luis FariaFaria (6-3 6-74 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Socrates Leon TsoronisLeon Tsoronis – Alexander DonskiDonski (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Emina BektasBektas (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jana FettFett – Yexin MaMa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Petra MarticMartic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Greetje MinnenMinnen (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Sijia WeiWei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Arantxa RusRus (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Jaqueline CristianCristian (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Suzan LamensLamens – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
