Zsombor Piros and Geoffrey Blancaneaux will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Brest Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.65
Geoffrey Blancaneaux -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Geoffrey Blancaneaux
This will be the 3rd time that Zsombor Piros and Geoffrey Blancaneaux clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Piros won 7-5 7-6(5) in the 1st round in the Karlsruhe Challenger back in 2023.
Zsombor Piros
27 - 26win/loss
249
106
LLWWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-29 | 1-6 | 17-17 | 13-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-2 | 1-1 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, Zsombor got to the qualifications after beating Arthur Reymond 1-6 6-1 7-6(3).
In the qualifications against Reymond, Zsombor recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-1 7-63). During the match, Piros scored 90 points vs Reymond’s 78. Piros was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Piros recorded 2 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults. Overall, Zsombor Piros was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (38/51) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Hungarian broke Reymond twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Piros has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (259-160). 9-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Piros has a compiled40-27 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Cherbourg Challenger where he overcame Matteo Martineau in the final 6-3 6-4.
The Hungarian has a composed 27-26 win-loss record in 2024, 9-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
20 - 28win/loss
279
134
LLWWLLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-33 | 6-5 | 13-19 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-37 | 7-10 | 14-18 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-38 | 17-10 | 14-15 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-31 | 8-6 | 17-19 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 23-17 | 11-3 | 5-9 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 251, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Alexandre Reco 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Geoffrey had a good straight sets win against Reco (6-1 6-4). During the match Blancaneaux scored 68 points vs Reco’s 47. Geoffrey was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Blancaneaux managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Geoffrey Blancaneaux was pretty effective on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Reco 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
His best result of the season was winning the title the New Delhi Challenger where he overcame Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 6-4 6-2.
Geoffrey has a compiled 20-28 win-loss record in 2024, 1-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Blancaneaux |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 17 |
| Pts | 90-78 | 68-47 |
| Total Points | 168 | 115 |
| Winners | 38 | 25 |
| %Winners | 42% | 37% |
Both Piros and Blancaneaux played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Zsombor Piros dropped 1 set while Geoffrey Blancaneaux hasn’t lost a set so far. Piros has played 1 set more than Blancaneaux (3 vs 2). Therefore, Piros played 10 games more than Blancaneaux. Zsombor scored 38 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The French player managed to score 25 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Blancaneaux |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 51/74 | 30/50 |
| %1st in | 69% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 25/30 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 13/20 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 65% |
Piros struck 2 aces . Blancaneaux recorded 6 aces . Piros won 75% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Blancaneaux won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Blancaneaux |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 3/13 |
| % Converted | 25% | 23% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 33% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Zsombor broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. The Hungarian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 23% conversion rate. Blancaneaux was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Piros | |||
| Q1 Reymond |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-1 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 90-78 | 90-78 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 51/74 | 51/74 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 38/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Blancaneaux | |||
| Q1 Reco |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-47 | 68-47 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/50 | 30/50 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/13 | 3/13 | |
| Converted % | 23% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLW
LLWWLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Matteo MartineauMartineau (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
