Calvin Hemery and Egor Gerasimov will face off in the qualifications of the Brest Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Calvin Hemery who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Calvin Hemery is the pick to win this match.
Calvin Hemery -> 1.64
Egor Gerasimov -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Calvin Hemery vs. Egor Gerasimov
This will be the 2nd time that Calvin Hemery and Egor Gerasimov fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Hemery (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Hemery won 6-4 6-2 in the qualifications in Marrakech back in 2018.
Calvin Hemery
32 - 30win/loss
201
116
LWWWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-33 | 1-3 | 27-19 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-25 | 8-2 | 28-14 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-29 | 6-6 | 19-16 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-20 | 8-6 | 20-8 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 7-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 235, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg 7-5 7-6(5).
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Gueymard Wayenburg (7-5 7-65). During the match, Hemery scored 81 points vs Gueymard Wayenburg’s 69. Hemery was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hemery blasted 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Calvin Hemery was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (41/51) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Hemery broke Gueymard Wayenburg twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Hemery has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (316-223). 6-9 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hemery has an overall 59-54 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The French player best result of the year was getting to the final in the Blois Challenger and the Tampere Challenger.
Calvin has a compiled 32-30 win-loss record in 2024, 6-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Egor Gerasimov
28 - 29win/loss
331
65
LLWLWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-32 | 16-17 | 0-3 | 13-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-25 | 18-15 | 1-3 | 7-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-16 | 8-10 | 7-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-32 | 5-10 | 2-8 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-15 | 6-6 | 1-3 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 320, the Belarussian reached the qualifications after beating Maxime Chazal 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Gerasimov had a good straight sets win against Chazal (6-1 6-4). During the match Gerasimov scored 75 points vs Chazal’s 54. Egor was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Gerasimov struck 16 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Egor Gerasimov was pretty efficient on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Belarussian broke Chazal 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Gerasimov’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Wuxi Challenger.
Egor has an aggregate 28-29 win-loss record in 2024, 12-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Gerasimov has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hemery | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 17 |
| Pts | 81-69 | 75-54 |
| Total Points | 150 | 129 |
| Winners | 41 | 30 |
| %Winners | 51% | 40% |
Both Hemery and Gerasimov played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hemery and Gerasimov have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hemery played 8 games more than Gerasimov. Hemery scored 41 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Gerasimov made 30 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hemery | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 16 |
| 1st in | 51/70 | 35/54 |
| %1st in | 73% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 41/51 | 30/35 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 10/19 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 53% |
Hemery struck 5 aces . Gerasimov managed to score 16 aces . Hemery won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Gerasimov won 86% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hemery | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/13 |
| % Converted | 33% | 23% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The French player broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Hemery surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Belarussian broke his opponent 3 times with a 23% conversion rate. Gerasimov was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Hemery | |||
| Q1 Gueymard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 81-69 | 81-69 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 51/70 | 51/70 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 41/51 | 41/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gerasimov | |||
| Q1 Chazal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 75-54 | 75-54 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 16 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/54 | 35/54 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/13 | 3/13 | |
| Converted % | 23% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWLW
LLWLWLLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Matteo MartineauMartineau (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
