James Duckworth and Sumit Nagal will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Swiss Indoors Basel for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 2:00 pm on IWB COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.31
Sumit Nagal -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Sumit Nagal
This will be the 2nd time that James Duckworth and Sumit Nagal play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Duckworth (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Duckworth won 6-3 6-3 in the 2nd round in the Canberra Challenger back in 2016.
James Duckworth
41 - 25win/loss
82
46
LLLLWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-29 | 23-14 | 2-3 | 7-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-10 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 63, Duckworth reached the qualifications after beating Mika Brunold 6-3 7-6(4).
In the qualifications, James had a good straight sets win against Brunold (6-3 7-64). During the match, Duckworth scored 73 points vs Brunold’s 58. James was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Duckworth blasted 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, James Duckworth was very effective on serve to win 82% (37/45) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. James broke Brunold twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Duckworth has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (310-201). 6-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Duckworth has an overall 31-26 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Hangzhou Challenger where he defeated Mackenzie Mcdonald in the final 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
The Australian has a composed 41-25 win-loss record in 2024, 6-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Basel
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
32 - 25win/loss
98
68
LLLLWLLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 78, Nagal reached the qualifications after beating Facundo Diaz Acosta 5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
In the qualifications against Diaz Acosta, The Indian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-63 7-65). During the match Nagal scored 139 points vs Diaz Acosta’s 133. Sumit was very aggressive to blast 60 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal struck 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve 4 times and he saved 15 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (60/90) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (25/47) on the 2nd serve. Nagal broke Diaz Acosta 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Chennai Challenger where he defeated Luca Nardi in the final 6-1 6-4 and the Heilbronn Challenger where he overcame Alexander Ritschard in the final 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3.
Sumit has a composed 32-25 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Basel
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Duckworth | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 38 |
| Pts | 73-58 | 139-133 |
| Total Points | 131 | 272 |
| Winners | 37 | 60 |
| %Winners | 51% | 43% |
Both Duckworth and Nagal played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Sumit Nagal surrendered 1 set while James Duckworth hasn’t conceded a set so far. Duckworth has played 1 set(s) less than Nagal (2 vs 3). Therefore, Duckworth played 16 games less than Nagal. James scored 37 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian managed to score 60 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Duckworth | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 5 |
| 1st in | 45/63 | 90/137 |
| %1st in | 71% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 60/90 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 25/47 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 53% |
Duckworth struck 10 aces . Nagal recorded 5 aces . Duckworth won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Duckworth | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 43% |
| Conceded | 2 | 19 |
| Saved | 1 | 15 |
| % Saved | 50% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
James broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Nagal broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Indian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Duckworth | |||
| Q1 Brunold |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-58 | 73-58 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/63 | 45/63 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 37/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nagal | |||
| Q1 Diaz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-63 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 38 | 38 | |
| pts | 139-133 | 139-133 | |
| Total points | 272 | 272 | |
| Winners | 60 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 90/137 | 90/137 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 60/90 | 60/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/47 | 25/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 19 | 19 | |
| Saved | 15/19 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLWWW
LLLLWLLLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Casper RuudRuud (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marin CilicCilic – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Sumit NagalNagal (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Sebastian BaezBaez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
