Marton Fucsovics and Richard Gasquet will square off in the qualifications of the Erste Bank Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 3:15 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marton Fucsovics who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marton Fucsovics is the pick to win this match.
Marton Fucsovics -> 1.3
Richard Gasquet -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marton Fucsovics vs. Richard Gasquet
This will be the 2nd time that Marton Fucsovics and Richard Gasquet square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Fucsovics (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Fucsovics won 4-6 6-1 6-4 in the qualifications in Dubai back in February 2024.
Marton Fucsovics
19 - 16win/loss
104
31
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-19 | 6-8 | 9-5 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-25 | 17-11 | 6-6 | 5-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-26 | 7-12 | 6-5 | 15-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-24 | 10-9 | 3-5 | 10-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 21-12 | 13-6 | 5-1 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 93, Marton reached the qualifications after defeating Pavel Kotov 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Fucsovics had a good straight sets win against Kotov (6-3 6-4). During the match, Fucsovics scored 59 points vs Kotov’s 37. The Hungarian was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fucsovics managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Marton Fucsovics was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 97% (31/32) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fucsovics was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kotov twice.
Fucsovics has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (323-239). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Fucsovics has a compiled 81-55 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title in Bucharest where he overcame Mariano Navone in the final 6-4 7-5.
Marton has a composed 19-16 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Vienna
Richard Gasquet
32 - 29win/loss
129
7
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-32 | 15-8 | 11-12 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-31 | 9-9 | 8-10 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-25 | 8-6 | 13-10 | 11-8 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-20 | 6-5 | 9-7 | 8-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-10 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 135, Richard reached the qualifications after defeating Dusan Lajovic 7-5 7-6(2).
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Lajovic (7-5 7-62). During the match Gasquet scored 75 points vs Lajovic’s 64. The French player was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Gasquet made 6 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Richard Gasquet was pretty efficient on serve to win 83% (34/41) of his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Richard broke Lajovic twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Cassis Challenger where he defeated Jurij Rodionov in the final 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Gasquet has an aggregate 32-29 win-loss record in 2024, 2-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Fucsovics | Gasquet |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 25 |
Pts | 59-37 | 75-64 |
Total Points | 96 | 139 |
Winners | 31 | 34 |
%Winners | 53% | 45% |
Both Fucsovics and Gasquet played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fucsovics and Gasquet have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fucsovics played 6 games less than Gasquet. Fucsovics scored 31 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Gasquet made 34 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Fucsovics | Gasquet |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 6 |
Avg per match | 8 | 6 |
1st in | 32/46 | 41/70 |
%1st in | 70% | 59% |
1st pts | 31/32 | 34/41 |
%1st pts | 97% | 83% |
2nd pts | 9/14 | 18/29 |
%2nd pts | 64% | 62% |
Fucsovics struck 8 aces . Gasquet made 6 aces . Fucsovics won 97% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Gasquet won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Fucsovics | Gasquet |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 2 |
Converted | 2/2 | 2/4 |
% Converted | 100% | 50% |
Conceded | 0 | 3 |
Saved | 0 | 2 |
% Saved | 0% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Fucsovics broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Fucsovics very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Gasquet broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Richard conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Fucsovics | |||
Q1 Kotov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 59-37 | 59-37 | |
Total points | 96 | 96 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 53% | 53% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 32/46 | 32/46 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 31/32 | 31/32 | |
% 1st pts | 97% | 97% | |
2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Gasquet | |||
Q1 Lajovic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-62 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 75-64 | 75-64 | |
Total points | 139 | 139 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 41/70 | 41/70 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 34/41 | 34/41 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Jack DraperDraper (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Richard GasquetGasquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Cameron NorrieNorrie (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Tommy PaulPaul (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (1-1) – H2H and prediction