Barbora Krejcikova and Mirra Andreeva will play each other in the quarter of the Ningbo Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 4:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mirra Andreeva who should win in 2 sets.
Mirra Andreeva -> 1.4
Barbora Krejcikova -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Barbora Krejcikova vs. Mirra Andreeva
This will be the 4th time that Barbora Krejcikova and Mirra Andreeva clash against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Andreeva (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they played, Krejcikova won 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the 4th round in at the Australian Open back in January 2024.
Highlights Barbora Krejcikova vs Mirra Andreeva – Australian Open 21-January-2024
Barbora Krejcikova
19 - 13win/loss
10
2
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-16 | 7-7 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-19 | 22-11 | 5-5 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 25-15 | 12-10 | 2-3 | 9-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 45-19 | 27-13 | 15-3 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 22-10 | 7-4 | 9-4 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 13, Krejcikova reached the quarter after defeating Yexin Ma 7-6(5) 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Krejcikova had a good straight sets win against Ma (7-65 6-3). During the match, Krejcikova scored 79 points vs Ma’s 70. The Czech was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krejcikova bagged 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Barbora Krejcikova lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Krejcikova put 58% of her first serves in, winning 62% (26/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Ma 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Krejcikova has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of her matches (274-176). 7-6 on hard in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Krejcikova has an aggregate 111-81 record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title at the Wimbledon where she overcame Jasmine Paolini in the final 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Barbora has a composed 19-13 win-loss record in 2024, 7-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Ningbo
Barbora has never competed in this tournament before.
Mirra Andreeva
32 - 15win/loss
16
16
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-16 | 18-9 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-9 | 7-4 | 23-4 | 0-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-9 | 21-5 | 18-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 19 (career-high), Mirra reached the quarter after defeating Varvara Lepchenko 6-2 6-0 and Tamara Korpatsch 6-0 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Mirra had a good straight sets win against Korpatsch (6-0 6-4). During the match Andreeva scored 64 points vs Korpatsch’s 45. Mirra was exceptionally aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Andreeva scored 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Mirra Andreeva lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Andreeva put 65% of her first serves in, winning 53% (17/32) of the points behind her 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the 2nd serve. Andreeva broke Korpatsch 6 times after converting 60% of her break points (6/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mirra hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 63% of the points she played.
Her best result of the year was winning the title in Iasi where she overcame Elina Avanesyan in the final 5-7 7-5 4-0 ret..
Mirra has a composed 32-15 win-loss record in 2024, 16-8 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Krejcikova | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
Tot Games | 22 | 30 |
Pts | 79-70 | 119-70 |
Total Points | 149 | 189 |
Winners | 26 | 42 |
%Winners | 33% | 35% |
Krejcikova played 1 match while Andreeva competed in 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Krejcikova has played 2 set(s) less than Andreeva (2 vs 4). Therefore, Krejcikova played 8 games less than Andreeva. The Czech scored 26 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Russian bagged 42 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Krejcikova | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 5 |
Avg per match | 2 | 2.5 |
1st in | 42/72 | 61/87 |
%1st in | 58% | 70% |
1st pts | 26/42 | 42/61 |
%1st pts | 62% | 69% |
2nd pts | 17/30 | 18/26 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 69% |
Krejcikova fired 2 aces . Andreeva blasted 5 aces (2.5 per match). Krejcikova won 62% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Andreeva won 69% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Krejcikova | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 11 |
Converted | 5/11 | 11/15 |
% Converted | 45% | 73% |
Conceded | 6 | 6 |
Saved | 3 | 4 |
% Saved | 50% | 67% |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Krejcikova broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Krejcikova dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Mirra broke her opponents 11 times with a 73% conversion rate. Mirra conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
Krejcikova | |||
R2 Ma | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 79-70 | 79-70 | |
Total points | 149 | 149 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 42/72 | 42/72 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
2nd pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Andreeva | ||||||
R1 Lepchenko | R1 Lepchenko | R2 Korpatsch | R2 Korpatsch | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-0 | 6-2 6-0 | 6-0 6-4 | 6-0 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 60 | |
pts | 55-25 | 55-25 | 64-45 | 64-45 | 238-140 | |
Total points | 80 | 80 | 109 | 109 | 378 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | 17 | 17 | 84 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 35% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 29/38 | 29/38 | 32/49 | 32/49 | 122/174 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 76% | 65% | 65% | 70% | |
1st pts | 25/29 | 25/29 | 17/32 | 17/32 | 84/122 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | 53% | 53% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 5/9 | 5/9 | 13/17 | 13/17 | 36/52 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | 76% | 76% | 69% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 22 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | 6/10 | 6/10 | 22/30 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | 60% | 60% | 73% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/4 | 2/4 | 8 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 300% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Tennis Scores in Ningbo
- Aldila Sutjiadi/Yifan XuSutjiadi/Yifan Xu – Zhaoxuan Yang/Shuai ZhangYang/Shuai Zhang (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicole Melichar/Ellen PerezMelichar/Ellen Perez – Ulrikke Eikeri/Fang-Hsien WuEikeri/Fang-Hsien Wu (6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Christopher HeymanHeyman (4-6 7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras – Jonas MerckxMerckx (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (0-2) – H2H and prediction