James Kent Trotter and Govind Nanda will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Calgary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on ROGERS COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Kent Trotter who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Kent Trotter is the pick to win this match.
James Kent Trotter -> 1.42
Govind Nanda -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Kent Trotter vs. Govind Nanda
There is no head to head record between James Kent Trotter and Govind Nanda since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
James Kent Trotter
31 - 21win/loss
193
182
LWWWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-23 | 19-12 | 1-3 | 21-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256 (career-high), Kent Trotter got to the 2nd round after beating Borna Gojo 5-7 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Gojo, The Japanese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-4). During the match, Kent Trotter scored 93 points vs Gojo’s 85. The Japanese was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kent Trotter made 17 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, James Kent Trotter was extremely effective on serve to win 93% (43/46) of his 1st serve and 55% (21/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. James broke Gojo twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Kent Trotter has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (80-56). 11-4 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kent Trotter has an aggregate25-15 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Tyler Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 6-2 7-6(3).
James has an aggregate 31-20 win-loss record in 2024, 11-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Calgary Challenger
Kent Trotter has never competed in this tournament before.
Govind Nanda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-16 | 17-10 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 5-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 21-10 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 743, Govind got to the 2nd round after defeating Collin Altamirano 7-6(1) 6-2, Patrick Zahraj 7-5 6-0 and Tim Handel 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Govind had a good straight sets win against Handel (6-4 6-2). During the match Nanda scored 64 points vs Handel’s 46. Govind was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Nanda bagged 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Govind Nanda was very effective on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Govind broke Handel 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Nanda’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Lakewood.
The American has an overall 20-11 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kent Trotter | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 57 |
| Pts | 93-85 | 203-130 |
| Total Points | 178 | 333 |
| Winners | 43 | 69 |
| %Winners | 46% | 34% |
Kent Trotter played 1 match while Nanda competed in 3 matches. Nanda started his run from the qualifications while Kent Trotter had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, James Kent Trotter surrendered 1 set while Govind Nanda hasn’t lost a set so far. Kent Trotter has played 3 set(s) less than Nanda (3 vs 6). Therefore, Kent Trotter played 25 games less than Nanda. Kent Trotter scored 43 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Nanda managed to score 69 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kent Trotter | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 17 | 2 |
| 1st in | 46/84 | 84/154 |
| %1st in | 55% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 43/46 | 69/84 |
| %1st pts | 93% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 21/38 | 44/70 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 63% |
Kent Trotter fired 17 aces . Nanda managed to score 6 aces (2 per match). Kent Trotter won 93% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Nanda won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kent Trotter | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 13 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 13/22 |
| % Converted | 33% | 59% |
| Conceded | 3 | 9 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The Japanese broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. The Japanese dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Govind broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. Govind conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kent Trotter | |||
| R1 Gojo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 93-85 | 93-85 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 46/84 | 46/84 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 43/46 | 43/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 93% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/38 | 21/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nanda | |||||
| Q1 Altamirano |
Q3 Zahraj |
R1 Handel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-2 | 7-5 6-0 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 18 | 57 | |
| pts | 76-49 | 63-35 | 64-46 | 203-130 | |
| Total points | 125 | 98 | 110 | 333 | |
| Winners | 21 | 27 | 21 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 43% | 33% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 26/58 | 32/45 | 26/51 | 84/154 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 71% | 51% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 27/32 | 21/26 | 69/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 84% | 81% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/32 | 7/13 | 15/25 | 44/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 54% | 60% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/8 | 4/8 | 13/22 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 63% | 50% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 0/1 | 1/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 0% | 50% | 117% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
LWWLLLWLWW Tennis Scores in Calgary Challenger
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Aidan MayoMayo (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Vasek PospisilPospisil (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (7-61 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Andre IlaganIlagan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
