Patrick Kypson and Murphy Cassone will square off in the 2nd round of the Calgary Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on ROGERS COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.61
Murphy Cassone -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Murphy Cassone
This will be the 2nd time that Patrick Kypson and Murphy Cassone clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kypson (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Kypson won 6-4 7-6(4) in the 2nd round in the Cleveland Challenger back in January 2024.
Patrick Kypson
20 - 22win/loss
177
133
WLWWLLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-22 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 6-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Roberto Cid Subervi 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Cid (7-5 6-1). During the match, Kypson scored 68 points vs Cid’s 50. The American was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kypson blasted 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Patrick Kypson was very efficient on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Patrick broke Cid 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Kypson has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (201-121). 6-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kypson has a composed 33-16 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Cleveland Challenger where he beat Ethan Quinn in the final 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Kypson has a composed 20-22 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Calgary Challenger
Kypson has never competed in this tournament before.
Murphy Cassone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-16 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-9 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 599, Cassone got to the 2nd round after defeating Matt Kuhar 6-2 6-2, Mikael Arseneault 6-2 6-3 and Ryan Seggerman 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(13).
In the 1st round against Seggerman, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-64 7-613).During the match Cassone scored less points (7) than Seggerman. In fact, the world no. 177 won 123 points vs Seggerman’s. That means that Cassone was more focused during the important points. Murphy was extremely aggressive to blast 64 winners.
About the serving games, Cassone recorded 12 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Murphy Cassone was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (64/86) of his 1st serve and 55% (24/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Aldershot.
Cassone has an aggregate 23-16 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kypson | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 68 |
| Pts | 68-50 | 241-206 |
| Total Points | 118 | 447 |
| Winners | 21 | 112 |
| %Winners | 31% | 46% |
Kypson played 1 match while Cassone competed in 3 matches. Cassone started his run from the qualifications while Kypson had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Murphy Cassone conceded 1 set while Patrick Kypson hasn’t lost a set so far. Kypson has played 5 set(s) less than Cassone (2 vs 7). Therefore, Kypson played 49 games less than Cassone. Patrick scored 21 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 112 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kypson | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 8.3 |
| 1st in | 26/57 | 141/220 |
| %1st in | 46% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 112/141 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 42/79 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 53% |
Kypson managed to score 9 aces . Cassone struck 25 aces (8.3 per match). Kypson won 81% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Cassone won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kypson | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 8/19 |
| % Converted | 63% | 42% |
| Conceded | 2 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 9 |
| % Saved | 0% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Patrick broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The American lost his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Murphy broke his opponents 8 times with a 42% conversion rate. Murphy conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kypson | |||
| R1 Cid |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-50 | 68-50 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 26/57 | 26/57 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 16/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Cassone | |||||
| Q1 Kuhar |
Q3 Arseneault |
R1 Seggerman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-2 6-3 | 3-6 7-64 7-613 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 35 | 68 | |
| pts | 57-35 | 61-41 | 123-130 | 241-206 | |
| Total points | 92 | 102 | 253 | 447 | |
| Winners | 21 | 27 | 64 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 44% | 52% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 12 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 22/41 | 33/49 | 86/130 | 141/220 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 67% | 66% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 21/22 | 27/33 | 64/86 | 112/141 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 82% | 74% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 7/16 | 24/44 | 42/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 44% | 55% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | 8/19 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 57% | 0% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/4 | 6/7 | 9 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 86% | 161% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLLLLWL
WWWLWWLWLW Tennis Scores in Calgary Challenger
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Borna GojoGojo (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-4 7-60) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Alex MartinezMartinez (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Cleeve HarperHarper (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Alfredo PerezPerez (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (6-1 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Benjamin Thomas GeorgeThomas George (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Louis WesselsWessels – Justin BoulaisBoulais (7-62 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (3-6 7-64 7-613) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Max WiskandtWiskandt (6-3 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Borna GojoGojo (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Benjamin Thomas GeorgeThomas George (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Andre IlaganIlagan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
