Kyle Edmund and Jakub Paul will play each other in the 1st round of the St. Brieuc Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 4:00 pm on COURT TCSB. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.59
Jakub Paul -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kyle Edmund vs. Jakub Paul
There is no head to head record between Kyle Edmund and Jakub Paul since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Kyle Edmund
35 - 21win/loss
358
14
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 367, the Brit got to the 1st round after beating Leo Raquillet 6-3 6-3 and Bogdan Pavel 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-2.
In the qualifications against Pavel, Kyle recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 7-63 6-2). During the match, Edmund scored 109 points vs Pavel’s 95. Kyle was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Edmund managed to score 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Kyle Edmund was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (48/60) of his 1st serve and 61% (25/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Edmund broke Pavel 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kyle started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.
Edmund has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (244-168). 20-7 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Edmund has a compiled 55-24 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Kyle’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
Kyle has a composed 34-21 win-loss record in 2024, 20-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the St. Brieuc Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Jakub Paul
35 - 23win/loss
411
372
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 44-27 | 15-9 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 9-10 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 417 (career-high), the Swiss got to the 1st round after defeating Liam Broady 7-6(7) 6-1 and Maxime Chazal 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Jakub had a good straight sets win against Chazal (6-2 6-2). During the match Paul scored 56 points vs Chazal’s 33. The Swiss was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Paul recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jakub Paul was pretty effective on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Swiss broke Chazal 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Swiss started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Paul’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Sarajevo and M25 Sion.
The Swiss has a composed 35-22 win-loss record in 2024, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Edmund | Paul |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
Tot Games | 52 | 36 |
Pts | 175-145 | 124-90 |
Total Points | 320 | 214 |
Winners | 72 | 54 |
%Winners | 41% | 44% |
Both Edmund and Paul played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kyle Edmund surrendered 1 set while Jakub Paul hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Edmund has played 1 set more than Paul (5 vs 4). Therefore, Edmund played 16 games more than Paul. Kyle scored 72 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Paul scored 54 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Edmund | Paul |
---|---|---|
Aces | 16 | 7 |
Avg per match | 8 | 3.5 |
1st in | 92/151 | 71/113 |
%1st in | 61% | 63% |
1st pts | 72/92 | 54/71 |
%1st pts | 78% | 76% |
2nd pts | 35/59 | 26/42 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 62% |
Edmund managed to score 16 aces (8 per match). Paul bagged 7 aces (3.5 per match). Edmund won 78% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Paul won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Edmund | Paul |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 7 |
Converted | 7/13 | 7/11 |
% Converted | 54% | 64% |
Conceded | 4 | 3 |
Saved | 2 | 2 |
% Saved | 50% | 67% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Kyle broke his opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Kyle conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Paul broke his opponents 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Jakub conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Edmund | ||||
Q1 Raquillet | Q3 Pavel | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-75 7-63 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 34 | 52 | |
pts | 66-50 | 109-95 | 175-145 | |
Total points | 116 | 204 | 320 | |
Winners | 24 | 48 | 72 | |
%Winners | 36% | 44% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 4 | 12 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 32/50 | 60/101 | 92/151 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 59% | 61% | |
1st pts | 24/32 | 48/60 | 72/92 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 80% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 10/18 | 25/41 | 35/59 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 61% | 59% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 3/6 | 7/13 | |
Converted % | 57% | 50% | 54% | |
Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 0% | 67% | 34% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Paul | ||||
Q1 Broady | Q3 Chazal | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-67 6-1 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 36 | |
pts | 68-57 | 56-33 | 124-90 | |
Total points | 125 | 89 | 214 | |
Winners | 31 | 23 | 54 | |
%Winners | 46% | 41% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 43/67 | 28/46 | 71/113 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 61% | 63% | |
1st pts | 31/43 | 23/28 | 54/71 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 82% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 14/24 | 12/18 | 26/42 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 67% | 62% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 4/6 | 7/11 | |
Converted % | 60% | 67% | 64% | |
Conceded | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1/1 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Tennis Scores in St. Brieuc Challenger
- Jules MarieMarie – Moise KouameKouame (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Robin BertrandBertrand – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Richard BerankisBerankis (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Lucas PoullainPoullain (0-1) – H2H and prediction