Matias Soto and Joao Eduardo Schiessl will play each other in the qualifications of the Campinas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on QUADRA 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matias Soto who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matias Soto is the pick to win this match.
Matias Soto -> 1.44
Joao Eduardo Schiessl -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matias Soto vs. Joao Eduardo Schiessl
There is no head to head record between Matias Soto and Joao Eduardo Schiessl since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Matias Soto
37 - 20win/loss
248
246
LWWWWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 57-27 | 10-9 | 43-17 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-19 | 4-4 | 14-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-7 | 7-3 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-9 | 6-3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 311, Matias got to the qualifications after beating Luka Bojicic Ono 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Soto had a good straight sets win against Bojicic Ono (6-0 6-0). During the match, Soto scored 58 points vs Bojicic Ono’s 29. Matias was exceptionally aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Soto scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 8 double faults. Matias Soto was very efficient on serve to win 89% (16/18) of his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Chilean broke Bojicic Ono 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Soto has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (105-66). 26-12 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Soto has an aggregate67-40 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Soto’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the San Luis Potosi Challenger,M25 Trelew and M25 Arequipa.
Soto has an aggregate 36-20 win-loss record in 2024, 26-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Campinas Challenger
Matias has never competed in this tournament before.
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
39 - 20win/loss
539
539
LWLWWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-25 | 7-4 | 38-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-25 | 2-2 | 33-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-17 | 5-6 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 558 (career-high), Joao reached the qualifications after defeating Gonzalo Villanueva 6-3 2-6 7-6(5).
In the qualifications, The Brazilian defeated Villanueva (6-3 2-6 7-65).During the match Eduardo scored less points (3) than Villanueva. In fact, the world no. 311 won 93 points vs Villanueva’s. That means that Eduardo was more focused during the important points. Joao was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Eduardo fired 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Joao Eduardo Schiessl lost the serve 6 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Eduardo put 60% of his first serves in, winning 67% (39/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (14/39) on the 2nd serve. Joao broke Villanueva 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Eduardo’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Celje,M15 Vrhnika and M15 Targu Mures.
Joao has a composed 39-19 win-loss record in 2024, 33-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Campinas Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Soto | Eduardo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 30 |
| Pts | 58-29 | 93-96 |
| Total Points | 87 | 189 |
| Winners | 16 | 39 |
| %Winners | 28% | 42% |
Both Soto and Eduardo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Joao Eduardo Schiessl dropped 1 set while Matias Soto hasn’t lost a set so far. Soto has played 1 set(s) less than Eduardo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Soto played 18 games less than Eduardo. Matias scored 16 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Eduardo managed to score 39 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Soto | Eduardo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 18/49 | 58/97 |
| %1st in | 37% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 39/58 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 14/39 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 36% |
Soto managed to score 1 ace . Eduardo also fired 5 aces . Soto won 89% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Eduardo won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Soto | Eduardo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 55% | 63% |
| Conceded | 2 | 12 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Soto broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Matias had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Brazilian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Joao conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Soto | |||
| Q1 Bojicic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 58-29 | 58-29 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 18/49 | 18/49 | |
| % 1st in | 37% | 37% | |
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 16/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 16/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Eduardo | |||
| Q1 Villanueva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 93-96 | 93-96 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 58/97 | 58/97 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 39/58 | 39/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/39 | 14/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 6/12 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWLWW
LWLWWLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Karue SellSell – Ryan NijboerNijboer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (5-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Igor GimenezGimenez – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
