Jacob Fearnley and Kamil Majchrzak will face off in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Nordic Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 3 sets.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.54
Kamil Majchrzak -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jacob Fearnley vs. Kamil Majchrzak
There is no head to head record between Jacob Fearnley and Kamil Majchrzak since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jacob Fearnley
38 - 5win/loss
99
89
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 45-9 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 26-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 98 (career-high), Jacob reached the qualifications after defeating Lukas Pokorny 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Fearnley had a good straight sets win against Pokorny (6-4 6-2). During the match, Fearnley scored 64 points vs Pokorny’s 43. Fearnley was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fearnley made 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jacob Fearnley was pretty effective on serve to win 85% (28/33) of his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jacob broke Pokorny 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Fearnley has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 81% of his matches (66-15). 19-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Fearnley has an overall36-4 match record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he overcame Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3 and the Lincoln Challenger where he defeated Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 6-4 6-2 and the Rennes Challenger where he beat Quentin Halys in the final 0-6 7-6(5) 6-3 and the Orleans Challenger where he beat Harold Mayot in the final 6-3 7-6(5).
Jacob has an overall 38-5 win-loss record in 2024, 19-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Stockholm
Jacob has never competed in this tournament before.
Kamil Majchrzak
63 - 17win/loss
120
75
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-10 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 146, the Pole reached the qualifications after beating Rafael Ymer 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, Kamil had a good straight sets win against Ymer (6-1 6-1). During the match Majchrzak scored 51 points vs Ymer’s 20. Kamil was quite aggressive to blast 16 winners.
About the serving games, Majchrzak fired 3 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Kamil Majchrzak was quite effective on serve to win 94% (16/17) of his 1st serve and 100% (12/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Majchrzak broke Ymer 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Kigali 1 Challenger where he defeated Marco Trungelliti in the final 6-4 6-4 and the Bratislava 1 Challenger where he defeated Henrique Rocha in the final 6-0 2-6 6-3 and the Villena Challenger where he overcame Nicolas Moreno De Alboran in the final 6-4 6-2.
Majchrzak has a composed 63-17 win-loss record in 2024, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Fearnley | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 14 |
Pts | 64-43 | 51-20 |
Total Points | 107 | 71 |
Winners | 28 | 16 |
%Winners | 44% | 31% |
Both Fearnley and Majchrzak played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fearnley and Majchrzak have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fearnley played 4 games more than Majchrzak. The Brit scored 28 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole bagged 16 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Fearnley | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 3 |
Avg per match | 12 | 3 |
1st in | 33/45 | 17/29 |
%1st in | 73% | 59% |
1st pts | 28/33 | 16/17 |
%1st pts | 85% | 94% |
2nd pts | 8/12 | 12/12 |
%2nd pts | 67% | 100% |
Fearnley bagged 12 aces . Majchrzak struck 3 aces . Fearnley won 85% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 94% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 100% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Fearnley | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/9 | 5/7 |
% Converted | 33% | 71% |
Conceded | 0 | 0 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Jacob broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Jacob pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Pole broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Kamil was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Fearnley | |||
Q1 Pokorny | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
Total points | 107 | 107 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 28/33 | 28/33 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Majchrzak | |||
Q1 Ymer | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 51-20 | 51-20 | |
Total points | 71 | 71 | |
Winners | 16 | 16 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 16/17 | 16/17 | |
% 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
2nd pts | 12/12 | 12/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 100% | 100% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Sumit NagalNagal (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Pavel KotovKotov (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola SlavicSlavic – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction