Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida will face off in the 2nd round of the Villa Maria Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on CANCHA 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida is the pick to win this match.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida -> 1.58
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi vs. Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
There is no head to head record between Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 42-30 | 1-3 | 41-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-23 | 0-0 | 45-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-14 | 0-1 | 29-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 367 (career-high), Emanuel Ambrogi reached the 2nd round after beating Mateus Alves 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Alves (6-4 6-4). During the match, Emanuel Ambrogi scored 62 points vs Alves’s 51. Emanuel Ambrogi was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Emanuel Ambrogi couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (32/41) of his 1st serve and 73% (8/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Emanuel Ambrogi broke Alves twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Emanuel Ambrogi has a solid match record in the last 3 years having won 65% of his matches (110-59). 36-22 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Emanuel Ambrogi has a compiled110-58 match record in the last 3 years on clay.
Luciano’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Bragado.
Emanuel Ambrogi has an overall 36-22 win-loss record in 2024, 36-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Villa Maria Challenger
Emanuel Ambrogi has never competed in this tournament before.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-27 | 0-1 | 38-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 20-25 | 1-3 | 19-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-29 | 1-3 | 27-24 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 72-29 | 0-0 | 72-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-9 | 13-7 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 374, Pucinelli De Almeida got to the 2nd round after beating Juan Manuel La Serna 6-3 6-2, Alex Barrena 6-3 6-3 and Francisco Comesana 7-6(4) 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Brazilian had a good straight sets win against Comesana (7-64 6-4). During the match Pucinelli De Almeida scored 70 points vs Comesana’s 67. Pucinelli De Almeida was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Pucinelli De Almeida scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Pucinelli De Almeida put 62% of his first serves in, winning 70% (33/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. Pucinelli De Almeida broke Comesana 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Pucinelli De Almeida’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Piracicaba Challenger and M25 Maribor.
Matheus has a compiled 27-21 win-loss record in 2024, 27-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Emanuel Ambrogi | Pucinelli De Almeida |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
Tot Games | 20 | 58 |
Pts | 62-51 | 207-161 |
Total Points | 113 | 368 |
Winners | 32 | 79 |
%Winners | 52% | 38% |
Emanuel Ambrogi played 1 match while Pucinelli De Almeida competed in 3 matches. Pucinelli De Almeida started his run from the qualifications while Emanuel Ambrogi had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Emanuel Ambrogi has played 4 set(s) less than Pucinelli De Almeida (2 vs 6). Therefore, Emanuel Ambrogi played 38 games less than Pucinelli De Almeida. Luciano scored 32 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, The Brazilian blasted 79 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Emanuel Ambrogi | Pucinelli De Almeida |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 2 |
Avg per match | 0 | 0.7 |
1st in | 41/52 | 111/177 |
%1st in | 79% | 63% |
1st pts | 32/41 | 79/111 |
%1st pts | 78% | 71% |
2nd pts | 8/11 | 35/66 |
%2nd pts | 73% | 53% |
Emanuel Ambrogi didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pucinelli De Almeida made 2 aces (0.7 per match). Emanuel Ambrogi won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Pucinelli De Almeida won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Emanuel Ambrogi | Pucinelli De Almeida |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 12 |
Converted | 2/5 | 12/23 |
% Converted | 40% | 52% |
Conceded | 0 | 10 |
Saved | 0 | 5 |
% Saved | 0% | 50% |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Emanuel Ambrogi broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Argentine had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Brazilian broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Matheus conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Emanuel Ambrogi | |||
R1 Alves |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 62-51 | 62-51 | |
Total points | 113 | 113 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 52% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 41/52 | 41/52 | |
% 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
1st pts | 32/41 | 32/41 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 8/11 | 8/11 | |
% 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Pucinelli De Almeida | |||||
Q1 Manuel La Serna |
Q3 Barrena |
R1 Comesana |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 23 | 58 | |
pts | 64-42 | 73-52 | 70-67 | 207-161 | |
Total points | 106 | 125 | 137 | 368 | |
Winners | 20 | 26 | 33 | 79 | |
%Winners | 31% | 36% | 47% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 29/52 | 35/49 | 47/76 | 111/177 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 71% | 62% | 63% | |
1st pts | 20/29 | 26/35 | 33/47 | 79/111 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 74% | 70% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 13/23 | 9/14 | 13/29 | 35/66 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 64% | 45% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 4/12 | 3/4 | 12/23 | |
Converted % | 71% | 33% | 75% | 52% | |
Conceded | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1/2 | 3/5 | 5 | |
Saved % | 33% | 50% | 60% | 143% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Villa Maria Challenger
- Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiEmanuel Ambrogi – Mateus AlvesAlves (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Boris Arias/Federico ZeballosArias/Federico Zeballos – Tristan Boyer/Juan Pablo FicovichBoyer/Juan Pablo Ficovich (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Lautaro MidonMidon (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (2-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Francisco ComesanaComesana (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Scott Duncan/Hunter ReeseDuncan/Hunter Reese – Mateo Del Pino/Juan Manuel La SernaDel Pino/Juan Manuel La Serna (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Hady HabibHabib (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (3-6 7-5 7-60) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (7-5 6-73 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Facundo MenaMena (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-1) – H2H and prediction