Federico Agustin Gomez and Pedro Sakamoto will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Villa Maria Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CANCHA 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Agustin Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Agustin Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 1.42
Pedro Sakamoto -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. Pedro Sakamoto
There is no head to head record between Federico Agustin Gomez and Pedro Sakamoto since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Federico Agustin Gomez
54 - 24win/loss
137
135
LLLWWWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 59-28 | 9-7 | 50-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, Agustin Gomez got to the 2nd round after beating Alvaro Guillen Meza 3-6 7-5 7-6(0).
In the 1st round against Guillen Meza, Federico recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 7-60). During the match, Agustin Gomez scored 125 points vs Guillen Meza’s 119. Federico was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agustin Gomez made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Federico Agustin Gomez was quite effective on serve to win 73% (51/70) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Agustin Gomez broke Guillen Meza twice after converting 9% of his break points (2/22).
Agustin Gomez has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (163-84). 45-17 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Agustin Gomez has a composed103-50 record in the last 4 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Milan Challenger where he beat Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Trieste Challenger where he defeated Tomas Barrios Vera in the final 6-1 6-2.
The Argentine has a compiled 54-23 win-loss record in 2024, 45-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Villa Maria Challenger
Agustin Gomez has never competed in this tournament before.
Pedro Sakamoto
32 - 23win/loss
335
271
LLWLWLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-30 | 7-3 | 28-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-24 | 4-2 | 35-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-24 | 2-3 | 19-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-14 | 2-2 | 14-10 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 286, Sakamoto got to the 2nd round after defeating Juan Ignacio Londero 7-5 6-7(3) 6-0.
In the 1st round, The Brazilian defeated Londero (7-5 6-73 6-0). During the match Sakamoto scored 122 points vs Londero’s 99. Pedro was quite aggressive to blast 58 winners.
Talking about serving, Sakamoto scored 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Pedro Sakamoto lost the serve 3 times and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Sakamoto put 72% of his first serves in, winning 62% (58/94) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (17/36) on the 2nd serve. Sakamoto broke Londero 7 times after converting 88% of his break points (7/8).
Sakamoto’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Belem and M25 Sao Paulo.
Pedro has an overall 31-23 win-loss record in 2024, 25-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agustin Gomez | Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 31 |
| Pts | 125-119 | 122-99 |
| Total Points | 244 | 221 |
| Winners | 51 | 58 |
| %Winners | 41% | 48% |
Both Agustin Gomez and Sakamoto played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Federico Agustin Gomez conceded 1 set, while Pedro Sakamoto conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Agustin Gomez and Sakamoto have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Agustin Gomez played 3 games more than Sakamoto. Federico scored 51 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Brazilian scored 58 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agustin Gomez | Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 9 |
| 1st in | 70/106 | 94/130 |
| %1st in | 66% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 51/70 | 58/94 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 17/36 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 47% |
Agustin Gomez fired 6 aces . Sakamoto blasted 9 aces . Agustin Gomez won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Sakamoto won 62% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agustin Gomez | Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 7 |
| Converted | 2/22 | 7/8 |
| % Converted | 9% | 88% |
| Conceded | 8 | 15 |
| Saved | 6 | 12 |
| % Saved | 75% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Federico broke his opponent twice with a 9% conversion rate. Federico lost his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Brazilian broke his opponent 7 times with a 88% conversion rate. The Brazilian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agustin Gomez | |||
| R1 Guillen Meza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 7-60 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 125-119 | 125-119 | |
| Total points | 244 | 244 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 70/106 | 70/106 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 51/70 | 51/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/22 | 2/22 | |
| Converted % | 9% | 9% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sakamoto | |||
| R1 Londero |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-73 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 122-99 | 122-99 | |
| Total points | 221 | 221 | |
| Winners | 58 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 94/130 | 94/130 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 58/94 | 58/94 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 17/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/8 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 88% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 12/15 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWWWLL
LLWLWLLLWL Tennis Scores in Villa Maria Challenger
- Hugo DellienDellien – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiEmanuel Ambrogi – Mateus AlvesAlves (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Boris Arias/Federico ZeballosArias/Federico Zeballos – Tristan Boyer/Juan Pablo FicovichBoyer/Juan Pablo Ficovich (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Lautaro MidonMidon (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (2-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Francisco ComesanaComesana (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Scott Duncan/Hunter ReeseDuncan/Hunter Reese – Mateo Del Pino/Juan Manuel La SernaDel Pino/Juan Manuel La Serna (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (7-5 6-73 6-0) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Hady HabibHabib (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (3-6 7-5 7-60) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Facundo MenaMena (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-1) – H2H and prediction
