Nishesh Basavareddy and Eliot Spizzirri will play each other in the final of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on KENNEDY-GROSSMAN. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nishesh Basavareddy who should win in 3 sets.
Nishesh Basavareddy -> 1.56
Eliot Spizzirri -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Nishesh Basavareddy vs. Eliot Spizzirri
There is no head to head record between Nishesh Basavareddy and Eliot Spizzirri since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Nishesh Basavareddy
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 42-15 | 29-11 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 12-6 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 199 (career-high), Basavareddy got to the final after defeating Bernard Tomic 6-3 4-6 6-3, Brandon Holt 6-2 6-4, Karue Sell 7-5 6-0 and Jack Pinnington Jones 6-2 6-3.
In the semifinal, Basavareddy had a good straight sets win against Pinnington Jones (6-2 6-3). During the match, Basavareddy scored 66 points vs Pinnington Jones’s 44. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Basavareddy managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Nishesh Basavareddy was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Nishesh broke Pinnington Jones 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nishesh has dropped 2 set in this competition to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Basavareddy has a solid win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 66% of his matches (45-23). 28-11 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Basavareddy has an overall39-17 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
Nishesh’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Calabasas,the Bloomfield Hills Challenger and the Charleston Challenger.
Basavareddy has an overall 31-12 win-loss record in 2024, 28-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Eliot Spizzirri
28 - 12win/loss
231
231
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 35-16 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 9-10 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 15-4 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 301, the American reached the final after defeating Ozan Baris 3-6 6-3 6-3, Abedallah Shelbayh 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4, Jeff Wolf 6-3 1-6 7-5 and Learner Tien 7-6(6) 6-7(3) 6-2.
In the semifinal, Eliot defeated Tien (7-66 6-73 6-2). During the match Spizzirri scored 115 points vs Tien’s 101. The American was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Spizzirri blasted 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Eliot Spizzirri lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Spizzirri put 69% of his first serves in, winning 66% (50/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Tien 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 4 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Eliot’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Wichita,M25 Tulsa and M25 Laval.
Eliot has an overall 28-11 win-loss record in 2024, 27-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Eliot has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Basavareddy | Spizzirri |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 4 |
Tot Set | 9 | 12 |
Tot Games | 81 | 122 |
Pts | 294-219 | 392-372 |
Total Points | 513 | 764 |
Winners | 96 | 155 |
%Winners | 33% | 40% |
Both Basavareddy and Spizzirri played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Nishesh Basavareddy conceded 1 set, while Eliot Spizzirri surrendered 4 sets. Basavareddy has played 3 set(s) less than Spizzirri (9 vs 12). Therefore, Basavareddy played 41 games less than Spizzirri. The American scored 96 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Eliot struck 155 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Basavareddy | Spizzirri |
---|---|---|
Aces | 19 | 22 |
Avg per match | 4.8 | 5.5 |
1st in | 129/250 | 249/381 |
%1st in | 52% | 65% |
1st pts | 96/129 | 155/249 |
%1st pts | 74% | 62% |
2nd pts | 68/121 | 67/132 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 51% |
Basavareddy made 19 aces (4.8 per match). Spizzirri fired 22 aces (5.5 per match). Basavareddy won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Spizzirri won 62% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Basavareddy | Spizzirri |
---|---|---|
Won | 18 | 23 |
Converted | 18/35 | 23/49 |
% Converted | 51% | 47% |
Conceded | 18 | 39 |
Saved | 12 | 20 |
% Saved | 67% | 51% |
Times Broken | 6 | 19 |
Basavareddy broke his opponents 18 times with a 51% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 23 times with a 47% conversion rate. Eliot conceded his serve 19 times and he saved 51% of the break points that he conceded.
Basavareddy | ||||||||||
R1 Tomic | R1 Tomic | R2 Holt | R2 Holt | 1/4 Sell | 1/4 Sell | 1/2 Pinnington | 1/2 Pinnington | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 6-0 | 7-5 6-0 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 162 | |
pts | 95-83 | 95-83 | 66-48 | 66-48 | 67-44 | 67-44 | 66-44 | 66-44 | 588-438 | |
Total points | 178 | 178 | 114 | 114 | 111 | 111 | 110 | 110 | 1026 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | 23 | 23 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 192 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | 35% | 35% | 28% | 28% | 30% | 30% | 33% | |
SERVE | ||||||||||
Aces | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 38 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 22 | |
1st in | 46/95 | 46/95 | 28/49 | 28/49 | 29/56 | 29/56 | 26/50 | 26/50 | 258/500 | |
% 1st in | 48% | 48% | 57% | 57% | 52% | 52% | 52% | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 34/46 | 34/46 | 23/28 | 23/28 | 19/29 | 19/29 | 20/26 | 20/26 | 192/258 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | 82% | 82% | 66% | 66% | 77% | 77% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 26/49 | 26/49 | 11/21 | 11/21 | 16/27 | 16/27 | 15/24 | 15/24 | 136/242 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | 52% | 52% | 59% | 59% | 63% | 63% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||||||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 36 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | 4/9 | 4/9 | 6/10 | 6/10 | 4/8 | 4/8 | 36/70 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | 44% | 44% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 51% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 36 | |
Saved | 7/9 | 7/9 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 24 | |
Saved % | 78% | 78% | 50% | 50% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
Spizzirri | ||||||||||
R1 Baris | R2 Shelbayh | 1/4 Wolf | 1/2 Tien | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | 4-6 7-62 6-4 | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | 7-66 6-73 6-2 | ||||||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | |||||
Tot Games | 27 | 33 | 28 | 34 | 122 | |||||
pts | 83-82 | 115-105 | 79-84 | 115-101 | 392-372 | |||||
Total points | 165 | 220 | 163 | 216 | 764 | |||||
Winners | 37 | 39 | 29 | 50 | 155 | |||||
%Winners | 45% | 34% | 37% | 43% | 40% | |||||
SERVE | ||||||||||
Aces | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 22 | |||||
Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |||||
1st in | 54/85 | 64/99 | 55/87 | 76/110 | 249/381 | |||||
% 1st in | 64% | 65% | 63% | 69% | 65% | |||||
1st pts | 37/54 | 39/64 | 29/55 | 50/76 | 155/249 | |||||
% 1st pts | 69% | 61% | 53% | 66% | 62% | |||||
2nd pts | 14/31 | 21/35 | 12/32 | 20/34 | 67/132 | |||||
% 2nd pts | 45% | 60% | 38% | 59% | 51% | |||||
Breaks | ||||||||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 23 | |||||
Converted | 5/10 | 5/14 | 8/14 | 5/11 | 23/49 | |||||
Converted % | 50% | 36% | 57% | 45% | 47% | |||||
Conceded | 6 | 7 | 17 | 9 | 39 | |||||
Saved | 3/6 | 2/7 | 9/17 | 6/9 | 20 | |||||
Saved % | 50% | 29% | 53% | 67% | 25% | |||||
Times Broken | 3 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 19 |
Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger
- Luke Saville/Tristan SchoolkateSaville/Tristan Schoolkate – Patrick Kypson/Eliot SpizzirriKypson/Eliot Spizzirri (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings