Adam Walton and Terence Atmane will face off in the qualifications of the Shanghai Rolex Masters for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:00 pm on GRANDSTAND 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Terence Atmane is the pick to win this match.
Terence Atmane -> 1.86
Adam Walton -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Terence Atmane
There is no head to head record between Adam Walton and Terence Atmane since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Adam Walton
45 - 31win/loss
95
86
WLWWLLLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-31 | 41-24 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 95, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Maks Kasnikowski 6-1 7-6(8).
In the qualifications, Adam had a good straight sets win against Kasnikowski (6-1 7-68). During the match, Walton scored 63 points vs Kasnikowski’s 51. Walton was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Walton bagged 13 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Adam Walton conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 72% of his first serves in, win 91% (39/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. Adam was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kasnikowski twice.
Walton has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (153-82). 41-24 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Walton has an aggregate144-66 record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Burnie 2 Challenger where he defeated Dane Sweeny in the final 6-2 7-6(4) and the Taipei Challenger where he beat Illya Marchenko in the final 3-6 6-2 7-6(3).
The Australian has a compiled 45-31 win-loss record in 2024, 41-24 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Shanghai
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Terence Atmane
34 - 28win/loss
161
118
WLWWLWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-28 | 26-17 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 161, Atmane reached the qualifications after beating Rigele Te 6-4 7-6(2).
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Te (6-4 7-62). During the match Atmane scored 77 points vs Te’s 65. Atmane was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Atmane blasted 17 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Terence Atmane was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (34/43) of his 1st serve and 66% (21/32) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Terence broke Te once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Atmane’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Granby Challenger.
Terence has an aggregate 34-28 win-loss record in 2024, 26-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Shanghai
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 23 |
| Pts | 63-51 | 77-65 |
| Total Points | 114 | 142 |
| Winners | 39 | 34 |
| %Winners | 62% | 44% |
Both Walton and Atmane played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Walton and Atmane have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Walton played 3 games less than Atmane. The Australian scored 39 winners (62% of the total points). On the other side, Terence recorded 34 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 17 |
| 1st in | 43/60 | 43/75 |
| %1st in | 72% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 39/43 | 34/43 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 21/32 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 66% |
Walton bagged 13 aces . Atmane bagged 17 aces . Walton won 91% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Atmane won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 1 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 1/6 |
| % Converted | 100% | 17% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Walton broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The Australian pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Terence broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. The French player was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Walton | |||
| Q1 Kasnikowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 63-51 | 63-51 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 62% | 62% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/60 | 43/60 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 39/43 | 39/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Atmane | |||
| Q1 Te |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 77-65 | 77-65 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 43/75 | 43/75 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 34/43 | 34/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/32 | 21/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLLLLLL
WLWWLWWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabio FogniniFognini – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marin CilicCilic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yan BaiBai – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Daniel EvansEvans (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Linang XiaoXiao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Zizou BergsBergs (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Hugo GastonGaston (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
